For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of selling a product and its profound impact has become a long-running dispute among the general public. Although it is a widespread belief that companies' reputation is intrinsically rewarding, a fair number of academic researchers view buyers from their own perspective. Nonetheless, I am inclined to believe that each business should carefully weigh up the pros and cons of the importance of company's reputation or free offers.
From a socioeconomic standpoint, selling products is inextricably bound up with big sales, which it is a deciding factor in both attracting potential buyers and brand recognition. For example, a prestigious university undertook a comprehensive study in 2015 to demonstrate the relationship between customers' value and business strategy as well as gaining market share. Not only are the findings inconsistent with those of previous studies, some conclusive evidence presented thus far support the contention that stimulating people to purchase is correlated positively with customer service. Thus, it is correct to assume the importance of free offers.
In financial terms, a company's reputation is undoubtedly attributable to any business model, in that it would lead to making a profit, economic prosperity, and increasing market shares. According to my first-hand experience, a vivid illustration of such attributions is trustworthy companies, which is cause for concern since our civilized society has overlooked in taking potential buyers for granted. Hence, the dominant role of excellent customer service apparently can be seen.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that the advantages of company's reputation are of more significance. However, the local authorities are recommended to amend some existing legislation to minimize undesirable side effects of providing discounts and free offers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...duct and its profound impact has become a long-running dispute among the general public. Altho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...become a long-running dispute among the general public. Although it is a widespread belief tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, hence, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, thus, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77737226277 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32026337246 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653284671533 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3104535908 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.916666667 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176993215288 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602855923848 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456023470517 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106315528888 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552664045525 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.