Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not?
Recently the phenomenon of glamorous film or sports stars and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of accomplished characters is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the influence of famous film or sports figures can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, well-known film characters can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that imitating their lifestyle by adolescents, as well as following their attitudes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of glamorous film or sports stars on youngsters’ education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both recognizing adolescent’s talent in terms of art and bringing the popularity of the country apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of film stars as a role model for the young generation, successful actors might increase the consequences of criminal activities. Moreover, Fundamental aspects of committing a criminal would relate to this reality that the demerits of following their lifestyle pertain to lack of concentration on students’ education. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of imitating accomplished sportsman is correlated negatively with the wrong role model.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of glamorous film stars outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of increasing the motivation of young people in terms of art prove the significance of popularity, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68620689655 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41042153256 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.0791313254 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.909090909 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267828466357 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952725327808 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993522262772 0.071462118173 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146223399772 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318109171511 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.