The time people devoted to job leaves very time for personal life. How widespread is the problem? What problem will this shortage of time causes?
The given topic the time people devoted to job leaves very time for personal life has heated the controversy for a long time. Many people believe that spending lasting hours in office have the benefit of one’s career while others say it has no advantages. This essay will cater necessary arguments before jumping to conclusion.
There are myriad benefits of working extended hours in the office. To begin with the positive side, in today’s time the rate of unemployment keeps on increasing so it’s advisable that, work long hours with the dedication so, one can achieve their target and get the good promotion in the future. Further, if one is fails to achieve goals than, chances of getting promotion and increment are become less. Working extended hours in office creates the overall good impact amongst the managers and clients for providing the better services especially in the festivals.
However, there are also negative points co-exist with the above positive points. Firstly, people become workaholic and they didn’t spend time with their family and which overall creates disruptions in their personal life, sometimes it leads to divorce too. For example, as per the recent survey by the local news channel, it reports that, due to festival season, employees in the shopping malls were working 15 hours a day which is more than overtime.
To sum up with the above points, one should not spend much time in the office so that they became workaholic and by which their personal life disturbs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 457, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ours a day which is more than overtime. To sum up with the above points, one sho...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y which their personal life disturbs.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, while, for example, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.116 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46563906523 2.71678728327 91% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9815606213 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.272727273 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232024888058 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887326393634 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146440016667 0.071462118173 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162738443868 0.151781067708 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13233617278 0.0609392437508 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.