Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes is one of the most widely used drugs in the world. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long-term health costs are high- for the smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of health care costs and lost productivity.Do Governments have a legitimate role to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their own decisions to smoke, or are such decisions up to an individual?”
Tobacco in form of cigarettes is the most popular drug used in the worldwide and over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long-term health costs are high for smokers and community also bear the consequences. Some people believes that governments should have to legislate to protect citizens from the harmful effects while others argue that it’s individual decision to quit smoking and have healthy life. I am inclined to believe that both government and individual must come together and protect them. This essay will discuss both side points.
Firstly, Government runs various campaigns and programs to educate and spread the awareness of ill-effect of long term drug usage but results are not very impressive. Smoking is not only affecting to smokers but also causes issue to non-smokers which are in same vicinity and remain closely which also made them “passive” smokers. To save them, Government should levy high taxation on tobacco products, advertisements should be prohibited in movie theatre during movie. Government must be stringent towards the smoking. For example, In India, smoking is banned in public places but due to lack of toughness towards law people don’t follow the rule and has no fear.
Secondly, Individuals should be knowing the consequence of long term smoking as it’s root of many heart disease and lung problem, where parents and school authorities need to be more vigilant to children as teenagers start smoking to be “cool” in friend circle. For instance: school should ask children to prepare case study of ill-effect of smoking from real data, surveyed and findings by scientists to educate themselves.
In conclusion, the forgoing discussion propounds that to protect the youth from ill-effect of long term smoking, government and individual must work together to protect individual and increase productivity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...o fear. Secondly, Individuals should be knowing the consequence of long term smoking as...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46101694915 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90171075554 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606779661017 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6693209392 50.4703680194 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.923076923 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263864225452 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992663960948 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137768306135 0.071462118173 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153742274447 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113208619747 0.0609392437508 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.