What are the positive and negative effects of today’s communication?
The role of revolution in today’s communication is widely debated with many people claiming that the new means of communication have drastically worsened the situation for people. However, I believe that the potential influence of communication has improved the interaction between people. This essay will further elaborate on both sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are various reasons why contemporary means of communication have become a vital aspect of interaction today. The most conspicuous one is that the new technological advances have paved a way for an instant, effective and convenient interaction. Moreover, the human interfaces like Facebook, Skype and Zoom contribute to real-time and free video calling with distant friends and relatives. Therefore, it is apparent that distance is no longer a barrier in the recent forms of communication and offer advantages of free or nominal roaming calls overriding the primary forms of telephone and telegram.
Nevertheless, there are some drawbacks which can certainly overwhelm the potential benefits of recent communication. The most alarming is that these forms create a lot of distractions for the children and young adults and thus, hampers their work and learning environments. Furthermore, people are always glued to the screens of computers that they no longer engage in real face to face conversations with their family and friends. Hence, this evidence that people nowadays feel more isolated, dull and unsocial.
In views of the arguments outlined above, the merits of today’s communication far outweigh the demerits and the substantial influence of communication has undoubtedly made quicker and efficient contact with people although there are some downsides which can easily be overlooked.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62408759124 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15673177697 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605839416058 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6352780878 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.416666667 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168690777998 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531477765669 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670290013223 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105479022841 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659108968328 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.