What is your opinion on deducting marks on the student’s work if it is late?
Recently, the phenomenon of deducting marks on the overdue student's work and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of responsible students are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive for a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that suitable works can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, deducting marks on students' works can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as hard-working students, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of practical opinions. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of efficient works are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, deducting marks on students' assignments can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of late works are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inefficient students. Hence, predicted outcomes of improper opinions are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of deducting marks on a student's work far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of late works prove the significance of dismal opinions, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...that the benefits of deducting marks on a students work far outweigh its drawbacks. Not on...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67105263158 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18179007614 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640350877193 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3342357662 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.545454545 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357890120383 0.242375264174 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115990473999 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908664688716 0.071462118173 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207675484852 0.151781067708 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020776595243 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.