Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of buildings' design and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of modern cities is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a friendly office environment can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, positive impacts on people's life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of well-educated employees, as well as job opportunities, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the urban texture. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both well-designed towers and increasing life expectancy apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, negative impacts on humans' work might increase the consequences of social satisfaction. Moreover, fundamental aspects of under-developed countries would relate to this reality that the demerits of dingy houses pertain to the city environment. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of humans' behaviour is correlated negatively with old-fashioned offices. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of social improvement.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of facilitated buildings far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of hard-working employees prove the significance of well-equipped offices, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of buildings design and its corresponding impact has ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7984496124 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42865333945 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678294573643 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2711978381 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201791289582 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583480931757 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540749027065 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976457026303 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304348103272 0.0609392437508 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.29 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.