Speaking topics in text
TPO 44 - Question 4
Explain how the example in the lecture illustrates the concept of scope creep.
Speaking recording
Votes
Speaking category
This speaking topic by other users:
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-28 | ajulyav | 70.00 | Check this speaking | |
| 2019-12-17 | Christine hanna | 90.00 | Check this speaking | |
| 2018-05-10 | Elena Cristina | 88.00 | Check this speaking | |
| 2019-11-19 | Seema Modak | 66.00 | Check this speaking | |
| 2017-09-28 | ajulyav | 65.00 | Check this speaking |
Speakings by the user
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Gifts which people make by themselves are more meaningful than those bought in stores. Please use specific reasons and examples to support your response 66
- TPO18 relict behavior Using the example of the pronghorn and lion explain the concept of a relict behavior 78
- 8-2- A/D. In order to stay happy, you must have a job that you love doing. 66
- TPO-4 (humanities) Question type 4 83
- some students prefer to go to a small college or university, while others prefer to go to large a university. Explain which view you prefer, and why. Include details and examples in your explanation. 66
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 722.0 592.248995984 122% => OK
No of words: 175.0 155.574297189 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.12571428571 3.80514564318 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.525876923 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.10473518621 1.79077849142 118% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 93.7148594378 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.604071249207 99% => OK
Syllable count: 220.5 185.844578313 119% => OK
Avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.19417670683 109% => OK
Performance on coherence:
Topic speech coherence ratio: 0.0654814486387 0.0650381309087 101% => OK
Acoustic performance on paragraphs:
How many acoustic paragraphs: 3.0 4.35341365462 69% => OK
Average paragraph length: 58.3333333333 68.503853103 85% => OK
STD paragraph length: 36.6272515425 21.3332995233 172% => OK
Average paragraph duration: 20.02 25.9943957902 77% => OK
STD paragraph duration: 12.0806484373 7.84667146824 154% => OK
Acoustic performance on sentences:
How many acoustic sentences: 39.0 42.0642570281 93% => OK
Average acoustic sentence length: 4.48717948718 4.02192344571 112% => OK
STD acoustic sentence length: 3.7816818594 3.1217529195 121% => OK
Average acoustic sentences duration: 1.49769230769 1.45093177766 103% => OK
STD acoustic sentences duration: 1.20799147038 0.99851816184 121% => OK
Acoustic performance on acoustic silence:(An acoustic silence means a little pause between two or more words)
How many acoustic silence: 39.0 39.0421686747 100% => OK
Total acoustic silence duration: 7.16 7.12997991968 100% => OK
Average acoustic silence duration: 0.18358974359 0.185688545393 99% => OK
STD acoustic silence duration: 0.127047077474 0.155154303396 82% => OK
Acoustic performance on acoustic words:
Total word duration: 49.3 47.1480722892 105% => OK
Average word duration: 0.281714285714 0.305395592593 92% => OK
STD word duration: 0.162844109754 0.189427763521 86% => OK
Disfluencies: like hesitations, or 'ehn' or taking a long time to pronounce a word:
How many disfluencies: 3.0 7.94979919679 38% => Good job, the lower, the better.
Total_disfluencies_duration: 2.6 6.2937751004 41% => OK
Total acoustic noise duration: 1.43 3.39508032129 42% => OK
Acoustic rates:
Total speech duration: 60.06 59.7592369478 101% => OK
Compare to expected duration: 1.001 0.995987282463 101% => OK
Rate of silence: 0.649350649351 0.656000678711 99% => OK
Rate of speech: 2.91375291375 2.60215298798 112% => OK
Rate of speech by unique words: 1.74825174825 1.56821927147 111% => OK
Rate of word duration by unique words: 2.12981744422 1.99336655568 107% => OK
Average articulation rates: 0.48444144 0.317803793328 152% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by speech e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the speech e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas.