Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that they do.
-How far do you agree?
-What criteria should be used to decide how much people are paid?
Nowadays, money is an integral part of our life and everybody chooses a particular profession in order to earn living. But of course, the holders of different professions have quite various incomes. That brings up a very intriguing question: ‘is the earned money is adequate to the difficulty and importance of the work?’ Some people think several workers such as nurses, teachers and doctors are underestimated while actors, sportsmen and company bosses are exaggerated in term of the salaries. I agree with this opinion and I will try to support my point of view below.
It is clear that, edu...
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 87
- The pictures below show how someone can be tracked using an electronic tracking device. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown. 85
- The chart below shows the estimated sales nationally of silver goods in 000s of units for two companies next year The pie chart shows the projected market share of the two companies in silver goods at the end of next year Write a report for a university l 91
- The graphs below show the percentage of household energy used and the amount of greenhouse gases produced in Australia. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant. 90
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 305 350
No. of Characters: 1463 1500
No. of Different Words: 185 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.179 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.797 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.688 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 103 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 54 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.417 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.814 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.323 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.56 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.092 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5