The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012.
The line graph illustrates, the variation of crimes like burglary, car theft, and robbery in Manchester city center between 2003 to 2012.
Overall, most significant changes figured it on burglary fell dramatically over one decade in Manchester. While, robbery remained relatively steady in the figure, meanwhile, car theft has considerably highest position in city of manchester over the period given.
As it observed, the great noticeable trend displays about burglary, such as which began at around 3400 cases in 2003. After one year reported case was highest among other three games that is approximately 3800 in number. However, after the year the number of burglary case fell dramatically to 1100 in 2008 and the next year which went slightly upwards with 1500 cases. Then the graph remained relatively constant by the end of 2012.
Regarding car theft which started at about 2300 cases in 2003 and slightly increase to 2400 before dipped in to 2000 by the year of 2006. Then there were considerably high growth of car theft to near 3000 cases by the end of year which is surpass burglary by 2007 with 600 times. Moreover robbery remained relatively stable over the decade with slight upward trend in 2005 (900) in contrast to beginning stage (600), and 700 by 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eady in the figure, meanwhile, car theft has considerably highest position in cit...
^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'considerably the highest'.
Suggestion: considerably the highest
...n the figure, meanwhile, car theft has considerably highest position in city of manchester over the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ich began at around 3400 cases in 2003. After one year reported case was highest amon...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r. However, after the year the number of burglary case fell dramatically to 1100 ...
^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'surpassed'.
Suggestion: surpassed
... 3000 cases by the end of year which is surpass burglary by 2007 with 600 times. Moreov...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...urpass burglary by 2007 with 600 times. Moreover robbery remained relatively stable over...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, regarding, then, while, in contrast, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02358490566 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55206988497 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580188679245 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4810844036 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10657698856 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473967376449 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564629122291 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871725749747 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702669353194 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.