These days, there's an ongoing debate among people about formal written examinations and its legibility to test the knowledge at school. While it's possible to claim that having practical knowledge more important; however, many people believe formal written exams are essential to grade a student at the school. In this essay, I shall explain both positive and negative impacts of written examinations followed by a rational conclusion.
At the outset, there are many reasons why written exams act as a traditional method of assessing knowledge at school. One of them is that it’s been there for centuries and only accepted method of formal knowledge testing method. Moreover, some students tend to comfortable sitting for a formal exam than a practical test. Despite the fact that practical exams involve teamwork, formal written exams are more of an individual test. For an instance, based on an article published by a world-leading education researcher, it is revealed that formal examinations require more practice than a practical exam. Yet, more teachers prefer to hold written exams.
Nevertheless, those who argue for written exams, have a different view and say that practical exams provide real-life exposure. With respect to leading research conducted at Harvard University, it's revealed that practical assessing methods are much effective than traditional written exams. As per the research, neither teachers nor students agreed to change the method of evaluation. Therefore, it's advisable to adopt practical exams in school syllabus.
While there are strong arguments to support both sides of the case, but my opinion is formal written examinations have less importance when it comes to accessing knowledge at school. I would strongly recommend teachers' to adopt practical exams to strengthen soft skills of students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
These days, theres an ongoing debate among people about fo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51236749117 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82123115473 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56183745583 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6925574734 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275069566919 0.242375264174 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106172256176 0.0925447433944 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891737854712 0.071462118173 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191501286015 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680906959705 0.0609392437508 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.