Undoubtedly, financing of outer-space travel and exploration might be waste government's money because people will first judge one thing through its income and it is obviously not an investment with high productions. However, there are some other and perhaps more important factors for space travel and space exploration. Therefore, I could hardly agree more with the statement that it is not a waste of money for the government to invest in outer-space, the reasons of which will be illustrated as follows.
Initially, funding space travel or space exploration have benefits on the income of the government. For one hand, investing on space travel will being a vast of income on traveling in the future. To be specific, nowadays people are likely to spend money on traveling abroad, which means people prefer to enjoying this kinds of entertainmnet during their free time. In this way, in the next few years, as long as the space travel has been matural, people will keen on try the new things and will have a vast income and tax for the government. On the other hand, to invest on space exploration will have a reback income on resources. In specific words, there are plenty of resources in the space, like solar energy, neclear energy ets.. Once the government explorae these new energy to replace the expensive resorces on the earth, it will save a plenty of moeny and reduce the polltion for the environment. What's more, in a long run, the government will save a lot of fund on clean the pollutions. Only in this respect, the government can have a plenty of income once they spend money on space travel and exploration.
What's more, to fund space travel or space exploration have advantages on the government's reputation. That is to say, a government spend money on exploration of the space can show a strong backgound of science techolonogy, which is benefit for a government to attest its influenct on the international. If a government have a stong backgorund on space exploration, it will improve its repution in the world a lot. Take America for a example, the exploration of the space is the most famous in the world not only from the government but also from some privence company, which win a fanbulance reputation for the country. If a government have sick development on the space, people will think the government is low development. Take the north Koera for an example, which seldom have exploration on space show that the country have low economic development and low reputations. Hence, a fund in space exploration can win a good reputation for a government.
In a nutshell, which one I prefer depends on my own experiences, life style, and emotional concerns. To be frank, I would like to choose the idea that it is not a waste of money for the government to invest in outer-space.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...e travel and exploration might be waste governments money because people will first judge o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'enjoy'?
Suggestion: enjoy
...ng abroad, which means people prefer to enjoying this kinds of entertainmnet during thei...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
..., which means people prefer to enjoying this kinds of entertainmnet during their fre...
^^^^
Line 3, column 733, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...e, like solar energy, neclear energy ets.. Once the government explorae these new ...
^^
Line 3, column 906, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...educe the polltion for the environment. Whats more, in a long run, the government wil...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ney on space travel and exploration. Whats more, to fund space travel or space exp...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...pace exploration have advantages on the governments reputation. That is to say, a governmen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y on exploration of the space can show a strong backgound of science techolonogy,...
^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...on in the world a lot. Take America for a example, the exploration of the space i...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 39.0 8.0752688172 483% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2332.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85833333333 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88096904511 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.416666666667 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 741.6 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0505161267 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.047619048 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09523809524 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401286473906 0.236089414692 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156412712756 0.076458572812 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853857720271 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274874203902 0.150856017488 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079794367304 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.