Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of parental responsibility and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of family strictness is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both as constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that dealing with children requirements can be plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, legally responsible parents can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of educated kids, as well as high-social behavior, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research which discovered marvelous results at improving children’s manner. Had it not been discovery I wouldn’t have managed to do so. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both family structure and supportive family members apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, within the realm of science, children’s illegal actions might increase the consequence of anti-social families. Moreover, Fundamental aspects of criminal manner of children would relate to this reality that the demerits of extremely stricter family pertain to traditional upbringing methods. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of unpleasant results of parental behavior is correlated negatively with inappropriate social contacts, hence disadvantageous points it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of low-level social manner.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of Parental legal responsibility acceptance far weigh its drawbacks, not only do the advantages of robust society prove the significance of great family relationships but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87456445993 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39463316713 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662020905923 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.339629817 50.4703680194 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.272727273 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161198003024 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569359245184 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283422725084 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932532357149 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223880722742 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 12.6369458128 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 53.1260098522 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.9458128079 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.36 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 55.0591133005 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.