All nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage
students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems.
Global university will provide a platform where people can solve any problem without hesitation. However, I agree with the author view and think that for gobal development such type of platform is essential where students are directly connected and will solve the problem.
Firstly, students are the future of our world and they are full of enthusiastic and vigour to solve any problem. Moreover, they are also free from any bias ness and perceive any social problem. For instance, in Bangladesh, we know about the "language movement" where students were the main activitist and they differntiated the perceive injustice. Finally, they raised voice against East-Pakistan and bengali became the mother tongue of our country. The same incident happened in last year in "vat movement"; government intentionally added tax in the private education sector and finally student protested against this decision. Thus, any problem can solve if the student combine in a group and take a venture.
Secondly, the global university can also arrange various meeting where they can discuss various social, economic, political problem. They can also support financially poor people. For example, flood is one of the major problems in India and every year during rainy season people affected by heavy downpour. The flood washed away houses, harvesting crop, shop etc. In this situation, various student orgainization, financially support the victim and with food.
However, today's world is more technological dependent and designing a global university required much more financial support. Thus, without spending not much money if the nation connected in technologically it will be more better. Morover, students can also spend this money on solving the social problem.
To conclude, every issue has pros and cons and we must be careful for regarding such a thing. No matter how much better form anyone try to introduce there always remain something behind it. But, for social economic and political development, a global university design is essential for solving a problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... main activitist and they differntiated the perceive injustice. Finally, they raised voice a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uired much more financial support. Thus, without spending not much money if the n...
^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...connected in technologically it will be more better. Morover, students can also spend this ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 133, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tries'.
Suggestion: tries
.... No matter how much better form anyone try to introduce there always remain someth...
^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gn is essential for solving a problem.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 322.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50621118012 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84675569336 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580745341615 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3721149773 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3157894737 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9473684211 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148836537309 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503828611228 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054995871688 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0938557968248 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391148624505 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.