Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Wild areas are paramount to our survival on Earth. I believe that humans should do whatever is in their power to preserve all the remaining wilderness areas, if not grow more trees. I strongly agree with the statement mentioned above. There are innumerable benefits to preserving these areas, but I am going to layout only a couple over here.
First of all, these areas literally breathe life into our lives as they comprise the major chunk of green habitation on this planet where our pollution is filtered and converted into breathable oxygen. humans have already decimated a large portion of these natural wildernesses for economic and personal gain. Adding insult to injury, research has shown that if this continues we will go beyond the point of no return in no time, and no matter what we do or how drastic changes we implement to our behavior, we will be doomed due to the effect called 'Global Warming'.
Secondly, it has been shown and many have experienced this too, that people living in polluted areas devoid of ample plantation tend to be more irritable and lethargic when compared to those living in the countryside or in areas with healthy green habitation. living in the heart of metropolitan cities(lack of trees) affects our relationships, work efficiency, and overall health to a great extent. this, in and of itself, should be enough motivation even for the economically or the business-minded people to plant more trees or preserve existing areas to the very least.
Finally, we are privileged to have life, and over the course of time in conjunction with our busy lifestyles, we have forgotten who should we be thankful for this. 'Mother Nature' is the all mighty and the giver as well as the taker of life. In the race for materialistic goals, we have neglected the one thing that gave us life and started the process of evolution billions of years ago. humans have no control or power over this profound force which can wipe us in a blink of an eye.
Alas, knowing many of these facts, many people would still refuse to acknowledge the importance of the 'remaining' wilderness areas in the key to our survival and would exploit them for economic gain unless nations take prompt action and pass stringent laws to preserve and perhaps even increase the natural vegetation of one's nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Humans
...d and converted into breathable oxygen. humans have already decimated a large portion ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Living
...in areas with healthy green habitation. living in the heart of metropolitan citieslack...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
..., and overall health to a great extent. this, in and of itself, should be enough mot...
^^^^
Line 5, column 573, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...serve existing areas to the very least. Finally, we are privileged to have life,...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 388, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Humans
...ess of evolution billions of years ago. humans have no control or power over this prof...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which can wipe us in a blink of an eye. Alas, knowing many of these facts, many ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 321, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...even increase the natural vegetation of ones nation.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, as to, as well as, first of all, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86582278481 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63483863253 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574683544304 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.2691652071 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.133333333 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293920522178 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921743685537 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935623084237 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16825737381 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086317013387 0.0667264976115 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.