Televised talent shows have become popular in many societies today.
Are these shows a good method of finding talented people, or are they just entertainment? (rewrite)
Worldwide attention goes into TV talent shows. For some people, this is a good way to find star quality. For some others, this is for the purpose of entertainment. Both views have strong arguments. However, I believe this is a design to please the talented people starting their career.
This show selects the contestants in almost all big cities in Indonesia freely. The zero charge of selection registration allows as many people as possible to take a part. It cannot be doubt that the more people joining this selection, the bigger the chance to find those best. Furthermore, this selection is opened to all people without limiting on their social and economy status. This competition is not only joined by high economy class singer, but also by many singing beggars. Veri AFI, a young man who comes from an impoverished family, previously spent his time to sing around traffic lamp to earn money, but nowadays he has become a great start. In addition, the involvement of experienced jurists in this process maintains the reliability of the assessment and bolsters the excellence of input.
After selected, those finalists are trained to be the professional one. To produce a high quality output, they are facilitated with many great trainers, sophisticated training tools and even luxurious homestay. Then, every week, the learning progress is examined through a fantastic show which is broadcasted by a television station. Not only jurists but also the watchers involve in the rating process. To intensify the training, jurists eliminate the lowest rated contestant every week. Citra Idol who was successful to keep going until the last show in Indonesian Idol has already made a good own career as famous singer after finishing their contract with particular TV station.
From this long process, the entertainment aspect is only visible in the show step. So, it is hardly to judge that this event emphasizes not in recruitment process. To conclude, it proves illusory that talented show is more entertaining rather than finding out talented people.
- Some people say that success is 10 percent talent and 90 percent hard work Is hard work the key to success or is talent also important Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Study Sample 53
- Some people find history a fascinating subject Others say it is dull and has no place in modern life Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 85
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in millions of telephone calls in Finland divided into three categories from 1995 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant REWRITE 93
- In most countries multinational companies and their products are becoming more and more important This trend is seriously damaging our quality of life 91
- Opinions vary on whether students should take a gap year before going into higher education. Discuss the possible advantages and disadvantages of taking a year out. Do you believe that taking a gap year is a good idea? 87
It cannot be doubt that
It cannot be doubted that
those finalists are trained to be the professional one
those finalists are trained to be the professional ones
flaws:
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.043 0.07
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.952 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 335 350
No. of Characters: 1677 1500
No. of Different Words: 209 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.278 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.006 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.679 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 127 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 89 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 60 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.952 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.601 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.381 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.249 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.448 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.043 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5