Undoubtedly, people mostly engaged in busy, such as their career, financial situations and so on, by which they would require some time to be relaxed and be far from these hectic era's businesses. One of the best solutions to get relaxed is having a trip. When it comes to this point, many people believe that the best way to travel is in a tour which led by a leader. I personally repudiate this claim. In what follows, I will delve into couple of reasons to shed light on my response.
One reason that comes into my mind is that tours mostly restrict involved people from being free. In general, most tour leaders have ability to organize the trip plan as well. It results in enacting several limitations in order to stick to the plan. Thus, never can people do everything they enjoy freely on the spur of the moment. As I remember, having registered for a tour travel to Ahvaz, one of the most well-known cities in Iran, my parents and I were introduced to a famous leader. Actually, he made a perfect plan for visiting all ancient places of the city. Although it provided an opportunity to visit numbers of locations, as much as we could, whenever one of my family members wanted to any additional activity, which had not existed in the mentioned plan, s/he were restricted from doing it. This issue really annoyed us, and forced us to change our points of view about tour travels.
Another, should there be another better ways to travel than having trip in a group, never are all people in a tour satisfied similarly. Whenever people gather to have a trip, especially as a tour travel, people start to create bonds with each other. Since human beings have several distinct characteristics, some people may annoy the other. As a result, the angry people will not enjoy the rest of the trip. Again, on those days, there were a couple in our tour; they had started gossiping about any existed person in the tour since the very first moment of the trip. My sister got noticed whenever they were talking about herself, and an argument began. On the last of the trip, the leader wanted everyone to share his/her idea, and most of the ideas were about the argument, which had caused most involved people not to enjoy the ensuing days of the trip, and they mostly said that this is a very common phenomenon during tour travels.
A noticeable advantage of traveling as a tour which should have been discussed, is more usage of the trip than whenever people have a trip without a tour guide. Since there is an expert leader besides the involved people, leaders can really help people to know more about the places they have gone. I should say one of the best issues during the told travel to Ahvaz, in which our tour leader tried as much as he could, to present all places with several useful details. I learnt lots of lessons from the ancient history he told about, which I found really useful during my history classes.
To recapitulate, we can conclude that traveling as a group led by a tour guide is not the best way to having a trip. Among the mentioned merits and demerits of tour travels, it has been shown that disadvantages of tour travels weight more than their advantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, first, may, really, similarly, so, thus, well, in general, such as, talking about, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 52.1666666667 165% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2627.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 570.0 407.700716846 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60877192982 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88617158649 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36928184487 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 822.6 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5256883884 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.038461538 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.34615384615 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146867353317 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049503214989 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558276857706 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108333303321 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455168730296 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.