Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
Politicians are the peoples elected by an electorate in a representative assembly as a representative to present their needs and problems to the government. Politicians have a duty to understand the problems which are faced by an individual of a particular society or peoples or the populace and to make specific action to nullify it. Taking the common grounds to solve problems is taking a rudimentary approach to solve the problems and ignoring the elusive ones, can markedly hinder the development progress as ignoring elusive details can turn out to be fruitful in the sense.
Firstly, elusive ones are the area which are not given significant importance due to lack of resources or fear of failure but rather than ignoring one might take action to understand it as it might open new doors of success and can turn fruitful taking an example of Albert Einstein who has an ability to think out of the box, lead him to invent most of the things which was elusive to most of the contemporaries of that time. Similarly in the field of politics Mahatma Gandhi is considered as a father of Indian independence due to its elusive technique of attacking a government on the principle of nonviolence which extirpate the rudimentary notion of violence is important for winning any war.
Politicians are the peoples appointed by a crowd to take care of their needs and problems. But taking action is importantly concern with the individual elected as he/she has right to take action that can turn-out fruitful for people, for some instances taking common grounds are important as it gives a ready-made map of the implementation of policies, but the condition must be similar to other parts who have successfully implemented these policies and gain a fruitful result from it. Taking an example of road problems which are common to most of the other parts which can be taken for common as they help an elected person to take an action as quickly as possible as no time is to invest in making the implementation map.
In conclusion, taking the elusive details are important for the development which can lead into innovative approaches to solve the problems, however, investing more time to problems in search of innovative ones can hinder the progress as well, hence one must thoroughly evaluate the needs and problems of the populace, and then considering the other contributing factors to take appropriate action.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...ost of the contemporaries of that time. Similarly in the field of politics Mahatma Gandhi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing factors to take appropriate action.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, similarly, so, then, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98514851485 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92052671223 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45297029703 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.0 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 23.0359550562 191% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.527774319 60.3974514979 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 223.777777778 118.986275619 188% => OK
Words per sentence: 44.8888888889 23.4991977007 191% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.21951772744 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106732560102 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516594520703 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261484564573 0.0758088955206 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0699186714718 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324516666452 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.5 14.1392134831 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.82 48.8420337079 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 12.1743820225 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.55 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 11.2143820225 175% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.