The main idea of both the passage and the lecture is about the use of glass in the modern architecture and its effect on birds. With this in mind, the passage states that since birds cannot distinguish the difference between glass and open area, they will fly right through them and will make themselves injured. The author provides three solutions for this problem. The lecturer, on the other hand, categorically refutes all the three episodes of arguments mentioned in the passage, believing that none of them are effective in stopping the birds from injuring themselves.
First, both the text and the talk discuss the idea and the solution of using one-way glass instead of regular glass. In this line of thought, the passage explains that this kind of glass is transparent in one side and the birds cannot see the inside of the building, so prevent them from flying into it. Conversely, the lecturer asserts that the problem with using one-way glass is that it works like a mirror and reflect everything. To bird, this kind of reflection is as bad as regular glass, since birds do not understand the concept of mirror. To make things worse, if birds see the reflection of the sky and trees in the on-way glass, they will certainly fly into it and injure themselves.
Second, both the reading and the listening materials put forth the idea and solution of colorful design. In this vein, the author believes that the use of colorful lines and stripes can be effective both for the people using the building and the birds. However, the speaker opposes this solution, citing that although it is true that these colorful designs will provide opening for people inside the building, birds see those opening as an open hole. Consequently, they will fly through those hole and make damages. According to the speaker, if the unpainted areas of the glass become smaller, then this solution might be applicable. However, if they paint the majority of the glass, the room will be too dark for the people using them.
Eventually, both the passage and the lecture maintain the idea of the use magnetic field. While the author believes that the use of magnetic field will be efficacious for birds since they have the instinct ability to guide themselves, the lecturer refutes this notion. In this case, the lecturer believes that it is true that birds use magnetic field, but they use it only in long distances when for example they want to migrate from a cold environment in winter to a warmer climate. However, this notion does not hold true when the birds want to travel in short distances like traveling from one city to another. Indeed birds utilizes their eyes and brightness of light when traveling in short distance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 614, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...ike traveling from one city to another. Indeed birds utilizes their eyes and brightnes...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, first, however, if, second, so, then, while, for example, in short, kind of, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 7.30242825607 246% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 22.412803532 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 30.3222958057 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2253.0 1373.03311258 164% => OK
No of words: 466.0 270.72406181 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8347639485 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.04702891845 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40595457137 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 145.348785872 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452789699571 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 681.3 419.366225166 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 2.5761589404 349% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5515916297 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.65 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261947720492 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902677025005 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528064192894 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176094581938 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385049043893 0.0443174109184 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.