The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.
The four pie charts compare the electricity generated between Germany and France during 2009, and it is measured in billions kWh. Overall, it can be seen that conventional thermal was the main source of electricity in Germany, whereas nuclear was the main source in France.
The bulk of electricity in Germany, whose total output was 560 billion kWh, came from conventional thermal, at 59.6%. In France, the total output was lower, at 510 billion kWh, and in contrast to Germany, conventional thermal accounted for just 10.3%, with most electricity coming from nuclear power (76%). In Germany, the proportion of nuclear power generated electricity was only one fifth of the total.
Moving on to renewables, this accounted for quite similar proportions for both countries, at approximately 15% of the total electricity generated. In detail, in Germany, most of the renewables consisted of wind and biomass, totaling around 75%, which was far higher than for hydroelectric (17.7%) and solar (6.1%). The situation was very different in France, where hydroelectric made up 80.5% of renewable electricity, with biomass, wind and solar making up the remaining 20%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
Thu, 05/14/2015 - 11:49 | boxu.zhang | 70 | view |
- The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007.
- Many animals and plants are disappearing. State the problems and solutions. 70
- The diagrams on the right shows two types of building design that help reduce the effects of earthquakes. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.-Syerapke- (rewrite) 65
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should read only those books that are about real events, real people, and established facts.Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion. 80
- Bar chart and line graph 80
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 183 200
No. of Characters: 930 1000
No. of Different Words: 98 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.678 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.082 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.865 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 69 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 53 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 32 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 28 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.875 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.226 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.473 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.679 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.193 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4