large shopping malls are replacing smalls shops. what is your opinion on this ? do you think this is a good or bad change.
The importance of large shopping malls are replacing small shops which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential Impact in recent years. In my opinion, the proposition appears to be more rational. This easy will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that mostly people focus of large molls. Consequently, large shopping malls are replacing small shops. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that small shops very beneficial for all people because small shops discount for all purchases. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that large shopping malls is very costly. Beside, 50% individuals focus of large shopping malls and 50% individuals focus of small shops. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of large shopping malls are small shops are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11894273128 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61931969144 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533039647577 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 354.6 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6628057877 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8333333333 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387712186685 0.242375264174 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146106223567 0.0925447433944 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916263498834 0.071462118173 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247443152507 0.151781067708 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319884493956 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 55.0591133005 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.