The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The figure illustrates information about variant types of U.S.Energy usage by means of archive datasets and projected consumption until the 2030. As graph shows, there are significant differences among three groups of fuels (a)petrol and oil, b)coal and natural gas, c)nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower), on the other hand, petrol and oil are always by the far in first place, coal and natural gas are under the former energy powers and third group are located beneath the other two groups.
In order to describe more precisely, petrol and oil have approximately an increasing trend from 35 units in 1980 to about 45 units by the year 2030. Furthermore, there are some fluctuations (decreasing pattern) in the years 1985, 1995 and 2020.
The second group (coal and natural gas) have a soaring trend too. However, natural gas consumption was 20 units in the beginning of the curve while coal had about 16 units usage at the same year but coal overtook the natural gas in the year 2015 and natural gas reached in a constant slope amount after the mentioned year.
For third group description, it is obvious that all three fuels approximately began from the same units in the year 1980 and after some oscillations until the year 2005, they have constant amount of consumption. By considering the fact that nuclear power, solar wind and hydropower will grasp first to third places in their group respectively until the year 2030.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Energy
... information about variant types of U.S.Energy usage by means of archive datasets and ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chive datasets and projected consumption until the 2030. As graph shows, there ar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00418410042 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59665824812 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556485355649 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.0297566342 43.030603864 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.5 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.875 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1081242107 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058520588347 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071118058825 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0703999374391 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384243403539 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.