The line chart compares and contrasts the data on the changes in the amount of waste which is released by 3 companies namely company A, B and C over a 15-year period from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, while company A and B witnessed a considerable decrease in waste, company C saw a significant rise in producing waste over the time in question.
More specifically, in 2000, company A produced exactly 12 billion tons of wastes, compared with approximately 4 billion and 8 billion tons recorded for company B and C in turn. In the next 5 years, while both the amount of waste of company B and C went up by 2 billion, that of company A decreased to about 11 billion tons.
In 2010, company C’s waste output was about 7 billion, a position shared with company B’s. By 2015, after equaling figures for company A with 9 billion tons of waste, company C became the one which produced the most amount of waste with 10 billion tons.
- People in community now could buy cheaper consumer goods Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Internet users as percentage of population
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 70
- The chart below shows the total number of Olympic medals won by twelve different countries 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 760.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49704142012 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65782587353 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.1533302843 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.666666667 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203344862721 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127287149243 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513211876819 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152040058947 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467309025686 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.