No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The prompt recommends that no field of study can advance significantly unless knowledge and experience from outside the field is used. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this suggestion and argue that knowledge and experience from outside a field has a positive impact on that field for the following two reasons.
To begin, in a field of study there are several areas that require expertise, hence knowledge from another field can be borrowed to help advance in that particular area. For instance, In the field of Industrial engineering, there are several areas of study such as operations research, ergonomics, manufacturing etc. Operations research require the knowledge of mathematics, ergonomics incorporates the health field in its study and manufacturing employs the mechanical engineering field. The above example illustrates that the incorporation of these fields in the industrial engineering filed has helped in the advancement of the field.
Second, the significant advancement in the technology age did not just happen in a day. It all began from the stone age, to the iron age and then to the technology age that we are now in. The iron age relied on the stone age for significant advancement and so did the technology age rely on both of these ages. The abacus helped in coming up with the Paschals machine, another device for counting and the principle used in these machines are still employed in the computers of today. This shows that the technology field has relied on other fields for advancement.
Of course, some may argue that the sciences such as physics and chemistry do not require knowledge and experience form outside field to advance. How are the calculations done in these fields? Is it not with the aid of mathematics? Hence, this shows that all fields require knowledge from outside field for significant advancement.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, second, so, still, then, for instance, of course, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 303.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15181518152 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93641103658 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458745874587 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1447115242 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.066666667 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354359463508 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141870076833 0.0831039109588 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103208310999 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253451285288 0.150359130593 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117731251456 0.0667264976115 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.