Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled, they say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their home waste?
The need to recycle more home waste has been a major aim in many nations as these wastes which contains such chemical and other toxin materials that will pollute our water, air and soil. Some people believed issuing laws will correct these people who do not do the recycle, but I will argue that, if we look deeper the problems, there are more measures needed rather than laws.
Firstly, we need to understand why, even in some developed countries, although there are laws and regulations been imposed, people still do not disposal their home waste properly. For a normal household, it is difficult for them to distinguish what waste can be recycled what cannot. People cannot afford neither time nor energy to call every manufactures to ask whether their products can be recycled. Instead of giving laws, the governments should force companies to giving clear and striking instructions on how to recycle their products, if recyclable. For example, in Japan, a home waste disposal guideline is giving to every household to relief them from the unknown. Hence Japan has the highest rate of home waste recycle among other developed countries.
Secondly, letting people benefit from home waste recycle is crucial to inspire people do the recycling job spontaneously. That’s where the government intervene. A credit system can be used as an evaluation method to home’s waste recycle ratio. The higher credits they get, the easier for them to get lower interest rate on mortgage, or extra tax refund, can be an ideal solution to regulate household’s behavior on waste recycle.
In conclusion, to recycle more home waste can be resolved by many ways, laws may have some affect to behave certain people but may have limited effect on general public, the governments needs to seeking alternatives to help people understand the importance of doing waste recycle, and prevail them to take action.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 675, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...sehold to relief them from the unknown. Hence Japan has the highest rate of home wast...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...n people but may have limited effect on general public, the governments needs to seeking alter...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'for example', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.269444444444 0.247107183377 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.175 0.155533422707 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.075 0.0946595960268 79% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0333333333333 0.0501214627716 67% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0361111111111 0.0437548338989 83% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0777777777778 0.122226691241 64% => OK
Participles: 0.0444444444444 0.0403226058552 110% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.65944341918 2.80594681477 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.05 0.0326793684256 153% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.075 0.0861772015684 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0361111111111 0.021408717616 169% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0222222222222 0.011925033212 186% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1910.0 1933.35771543 99% => OK
No of words: 312.0 316.048096192 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.12179487179 6.12580529183 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.378205128205 0.374742101984 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.275641025641 0.28420135186 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.185897435897 0.203846283523 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115384615385 0.137316102897 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65944341918 2.80594681477 95% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.037074148 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599358974359 0.56093040696 107% => OK
Word variations: 67.2620473144 60.7387585426 111% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0891783567 81% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.7743622355 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3514936536 49.517814964 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.923076923 127.492653851 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7743622355 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.814263465372 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 51.5641025641 49.1944974215 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.60227272727 1.69124875643 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.516983018319 0.332605444948 155% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.133602583525 0.102741220458 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0665580532574 0.0668466124924 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.553240034251 0.534860350844 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.177658904999 0.148594505496 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207647512329 0.134430193775 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724965485963 0.0742795772207 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.316651350075 0.324371583561 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0614534728222 0.0638462369009 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338066011311 0.228012699653 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576636578652 0.058150111329 99% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.68436873747 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41683366733 29% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 5.90881763527 85% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.5751503006 233% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.4468937876 115% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.