I certainly agree that it is more prominent for students to comprehend ideas and concepts. Someone can consciously weigh the pros and cons of each side. The explanations go as follows.
Firstly, it would be very easy for students to memorize ideas and concepts for a long time. These days, the students ought to study hard enough to understand the topics. Sometimes, remembering dozens of rules and formulas for a long time would be very problematic. But learning the main ideas behind those statements can be a key factor to make simple this process. For instance, students can remember periodic table for three or at most six months. But it is more reasonable and feasible for students to learn how elements are arranged based on the atomic numbers in different rows and columns.
Furthermore, learning ideas and concepts can aid and abet students to be more creative. Nowadays, all adults perfectly know that the classic education, which forces children to learn facts, is not efficient and practical any more. Based on a research, which has been carried out by Psychology Department of Utah University in 2016, the students who grasp the main concepts are 60% more prone to be flourish and productive not only in their education but also in their future life and responsibilities. In fact, all ideas are interconnected like a chain or branches of a tree, and hence learning one of them can contribute students to see all hidden aspects and discover some new ways.
Admittedly, there are some justifications by one who argues that it is more crucial for pupils to learn facts. Chiefly, it can help students to pass a class exam. Indeed, final exam mainly is about the facts that are provided in the books. So it is more essential for students to focus and concentrate on them. However, still I affirm that learning ideas is more profitable. Although by studying facts students can possibly pass the exam, these facts cannot grantee a good grade. Plus, teachers now are more aware to assess students’ understanding from concepts and prevent from any rote learning.
Due to the aforementioned ground, all folk should bear in mind that learning ideas and concepts are more beneficial. Participation of time and creativity are two prime and conspicuous supports.
Essay evaluation report
to make simple this process.
to make this process simple .
to be flourish and productive
to be flourishing and productive
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 379 350
No. of Characters: 1836 1500
No. of Different Words: 209 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.412 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.844 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.716 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 116 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 81 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.227 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.463 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.409 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.312 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.506 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.062 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 597, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... numbers in different rows and columns. Furthermore, learning ideas and concepts...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 412, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...le. Although by studying facts students can possibly pass the exam, these facts cannot grant...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, as for, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01846965699 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83898637509 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564643799472 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3137408977 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4545454545 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2272727273 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285720930511 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889303527518 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663617791223 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15691548063 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506161337365 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.