There are certain considerations or factors that everyone can take into account to investigate and examine the best plan for friendships. I certainly do not agree that keeping old friends is more important than making new friends. Someone can consciously weigh the pros and cons of each side.
Firstly, making new friends increases your opportunity to learn more. These days, humankind experiences a huge enhancement and achievement in several fields of science and engineering including transportation, communication, and health caring. In this progressive world, making new and informative friends is a crucial factor that can aid and abet persons to extend their experience and horizon, and hence keep the pace with modern technologies and inventions. For instance, your connections or friendships with students who study computer possibly can promote your knowledge and information about digital camera, satellite, smart phone, or television.
Furthermore, preventing from mental problems is another noticeable reason. Nowadays, all people ought to work hard to make money for foods and clothes. Sometimes, they have to travel to other cities to land a great job with a higher salary. On this side, keeping old friends can be a thorny issue or likely impossible. Because of this, individuals should feel pressured and depressed. Making new friends can be an excellent solution for this problem. In fact, somebody makes sure that always there is someone to talk or go out to the park and playing amusement activities such as football or baseball, and as consequence keep away the stress.
Admittedly, there are some justifications by one who argues that it is better to concentrate on keeping old friends. Chiefly, old friends are more reliable because of the many years of friendship. Besides, new friends can cause a serious harm. However, still I affirm that making new friends has a higher priority. Although new friends can cause wanted or unwanted difficulties, this is the price that people need to pay for a new friend. Plus, it is more wisely for people to be careful at the beginning of any friendship till establish a mutual trust and also strengthen their relationship.
Due to aforementioned ground, all folk should bear in mind that making new friends is more beneficial. Participation of leaning and healthiness are two prime and conspicuous supports.
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
better change from:
Plus, it is more wisely for people to be careful at the beginning of any friendship till establish a mutual trust and also strengthen their relationship.
to:
Plus, it is still possible for people to set up a reliable relationship by carefully establishing a mutual trust at the beginning and strengthening their relationship gradually.
to match the topic.
----------------------
Your issue is that you like to use a pattern but the pattern may lead you to a way which is not so closely related to topic.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 377 350
No. of Characters: 1943 1500
No. of Different Words: 232 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.406 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.154 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.892 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 148 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 70 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 54 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.136 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.6 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.364 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.292 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.487 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.031 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, then, for instance, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32360742706 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00896553548 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612732095491 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1236355393 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2272727273 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1363636364 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04545454545 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262197904748 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080758827395 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935865458387 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146487412226 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404449758423 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.