These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away, whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time. Explain why you think this change has happened. What are the effects of this change in attitude?
It is true that nowadays, many people tend to thrown damaged things away an buy the new one instead of repairing things as they did before in the past. There are various reasons for this and this tendency also has some negative effects.
There are several reasons that make people thrown crashed goods to buy a new one. Firstly, people have higher standard of living so that they have sufficient wages to buy new goods. These new goods is certainly better and may be more convenient than the repaired one so that these can meet their needs of using. Secondly, many people now have a busy life and they do not have enough time to recycle things. Time spent on buying new goods is less than time used to repaired it. So that, with many people, throwing the damaged goods is a better and quicker way in compare with repairing it.
These trend has some negative effects. The first effect is polluting the environment. Goods is made of various materials, including toxic material such as lead. If this goods is thrown into the environment, it can pollute the soil, water and air around us. Another effect is that when people do not recyling things, they may waste a lot of money that is not worth.
Inconlusion, there are some evident reasons for the trend in which people do not recycling things and this trend has many negative effects on the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ople tend to thrown damaged things away an buy the new one instead of repairing th...
^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...cluding toxic material such as lead. If this goods is thrown into the environment, i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6265560166 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25708597073 2.80592935109 80% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522821576763 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5510576493 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6428571429 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2142857143 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223358397838 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759734018725 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526776496388 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151284716475 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583094393912 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 78.4519038076 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.