All the countries have assigned politicians for the conservation of the environment. But is it justified to be dependent on them completely for everything or the common mass should also fulfill their duties towards the upliftment of the society? Now, some people think that their contribution is not mandatory and that it is the liability of the government to do their job. However, I strongly believe that the participation of the every human being is equally important.
To begin with, people can play a vital role in the preservation of the milieu by planting large number of trees, it is absolutely necessary to make this planet a better place to live in. Due to rapid increase in the global warming and air pollution, it is quite difficult to live healthy. It is no exaggeration to say that today most of the world's population is suffering from lethal diseases. For example, in my country the amount of toxic gases in the air has reached beyond the acceptable limits as proclaimed by the government authorities. Indeed, according to recent studies conducted in metro cities such as Delhi, Mumbai and Banglore. Nowadays, situation is so detrimental that if a person breaths in open air for an hour then it is as dangerous as smoking twenty cigarettes in a day. However, we all are aware of the fact that trees aid in rejuvenation of the environment by absorbing harmful gases and providing more fresh air. In other words, we all can make a difference by at least seeding large number of seeds and encouraging our children to follow this tradition. Hence, it is explicit that the function of the society to save the environment is enormous.
Moreover, it is the population of all the nations that is to be blamed for the deforestation in the entire world. Since, we all have certain household needs for which wood is the primary requirement and thus it has become a business on a very large scale. Every day, people cut down trees in huge amounts to satisfy the greed of wood traders who supply these woods to various other industries like wood furniture factories, house building industries. Many people, even today use it as fuel because it is cheaper than other fuel options. I can reminisce about my neighbor who still uses wood logs for cooking and keeping her home warm instead of heater. All, these practices has lead to hasty destruction of the jungles and also of the environment. Although, there are many more examples but I think that this one set of example has proved my point.
To recapitulate, although many people will say that it is not the duty of the politicians to save the environment as we have elected them to do so. Conversely, I think that considering politicians to be completely liable for the restoration of the milieu is a kind of sense of irresponsibility because we are a part of this society and we can not keep our self out of it. If we stop using wood for our needs and start protesting against the deforestation then it will definitely expedite the process of conservation of forests and thus help the environment tremendously.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...y planting large number of trees, it is absolutely necessary to make this planet a better place to l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ggeration to say that today most of the worlds population is suffering from lethal dis...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, thus, at least, for example, i think, kind of, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 24.0651302605 224% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.3376753507 336% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2545.0 1615.20841683 158% => OK
No of words: 532.0 315.596192385 169% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78383458647 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80261649409 4.20363070211 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8790531824 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 176.041082164 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520676691729 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 814.5 506.74238477 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9097642534 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.652173913 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1304347826 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73913043478 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122873955053 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342738883845 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321912470678 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077304533824 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235445941733 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.