The social attitude towards each profession has changed in the previous years and teachers are not an exception. However, some jobs received more positive attitude while others like teachers get less attention and in some way people's appreciation decline in recent years. I believe this change comes from the increase in a number of teachers and a global behavior that dismisses teachers role.
With the increase in the availability of a subject, it will become less valuable among those who need it. This general rule applies to any subject in our world. Consider Gold as an example which people respect it the most among other precious materials. Similarly, teachers have become more available in recent years and as a result, people do not pay enough attention to them and dismiss their positive effect on society. However, a century ago people respect them more because it was hard to find a teacher. The number of parents who sent their children to other countries bolsters the fact that how parents had respected education and teachers in the previous century.
Since teachers do their job quietly and effectively nobody pays attention to their valuable contribution to the society. If one day they stop doing their job, people would notice how they sacrifice their time and sometimes health to educate our children. As an example a few years ago, some teachers avoid teaching because of low income and then the parents and government start to notice what will happen if they continue to hold their rally, there will be a devastating consequence on the education system that leads to unemployment and lack of workforce.
Overall, people have accustomed to the teacher's services and their contribution to the society and as a result, they become unwary of their role in society. This will suggest that people should be reminded that teachers have to be appreciated because they contribute a lot to a society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, then, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 318.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0534591195 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60440585706 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531446540881 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.627267209 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.785714286 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126762103514 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489678866821 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0221817935562 0.0737576698707 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849366476719 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00583686852172 0.0645574589148 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.