Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Thanks to the well develpment of transportation, more and more people enjoy to travel around even in a short holiday. When it comes to the controversial question whether to travel in a group led by a tour guide or alone, people hold different opinions. Personally, I think the best way to travel is in a group with a tour guide. I feel this way based on my own experience and the reasons are illustrated as below.
Firstly, traveling in group is safer than traveling alone, especially for a woman like me. According to a research, the possibility that a girl would get raped during a trip by herself is 30 percent higher than traveling with a group. In order to protect myself, there is no doubt that traveling with a group is better. Take one of my girl friend of example, she went on a trip to India by herself. When she head back to the hotel, she found someone was tracking behind her. She run to the hotel as fast as she could, luckily the man was gone when she rushed into the hotel. No one knows what would happen if she did not realize someone was overseeing at the very beginning.
Second, a tour guide is familiar with everything in an area. He always knows which suvenior store offers the best discount. Not only the shopping information, in order to attract tourists to register the tour guild next time, he will make a great effort to learn the history for a place to impress tourists. Therefore, there is no need to read articles and books before a trip. Instead, traveler can relax and listen to the tour guide to introduce that place.
In conclusion, for the two reasons that I mentioned above, I definitely agree that the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, so, therefore, well, i feel, i think, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 312.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4358974359 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54058930508 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554487179487 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9474783888 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4117647059 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3529411765 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244867669678 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869307402445 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106162499111 0.0737576698707 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189591981445 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111353802933 0.0645574589148 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.