Nowadays it is very hard to get a job in this tough competitive market. People try their level best to get a good job as soon as they graduated out of the college. Earliar, employers only look in to the education qualifications of the job seeker to consider a person for a particular employment. But now the situation is entirely changed, recruiters are collecting more personal information of the candidates like their hobbies, interests and martial status.
To begin with, experts says that a persons character is completed affected by his surrounding situations or in other words his living conditions. In order to get a clear idea about a candidate, companies also following the same strategy, because at present it is very difficult to hire a person just by looking in to his academic records. Furthermore, job providers also able predict whether the person is going to accept their payment package by looking in to his personal datas like martial status. On top of that hirers can also use some hobbies or interests of the candidates to benefit the organisation. For instance, if a particular person has an interest in painting or creative art, such candidates are well fit to the jobs like designing and art work.
On the contrary, some people say that these kind of data collection regarding a job seeker is completely useless and irrelevant. They argue that, when recruiters hire an employee they only need to look in to the qualification and achievements of that particular person. In addition, when companies do these kind of information collection, they are actually violating a person's privacy. Everyone has the right to keep their personal details within them. On top of that, it is not all fair to compare or mix a candidates person and professional life when considering for employment.
In conclusion, we can not say that collecting people's personal information for employment neither a good practice nor a bad practice. It is actually different from each party's perspective. If we consider recruiters arguments we may think that they are right, but if we listen to the job seekers points we may favour time. In the end it is still actually a healthy debatable topic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... To begin with, experts says that a persons character is completed affected by his ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... On the contrary, some people say that these kind of data collection regarding a job seek...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... person. In addition, when companies do these kind of information collection, they are act...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...llection, they are actually violating a persons privacy. Everyone has the right to keep...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 509, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'candidates'' or 'candidate's'?
Suggestion: candidates'; candidate's
... it is not all fair to compare or mix a candidates person and professional life when consi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill actually a healthy debatable topic.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, if, look, may, regarding, so, still, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97820163488 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96524375431 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531335149864 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7955840389 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3888888889 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5555555556 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264096825282 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784153606848 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049134480511 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161462032614 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245350390968 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.