It goes without saying that in such a sophisticated world where all people put all their efforts to find reliable firends who are convinient people, findings one would be so radical. So holly is friendship that people should be extremely meticulous about opting better one since they absolutely affect our life. In this regard, a contentious question come about which is whether small group of friends in a long run is better or making new friends. As a matter of fact, although I do not overlook the advantages of makong friends readily, I believe that having a long-term relationship with friends would be more cheering. In waht follows, I will delve into my conspicuous reasons to elaborate my points of view.
The first exquisite reason to be worthwhile to mention is that lon-lasting companion brings about trust and reliability which can not be found in other new realationships. Never does happen this pleasure with the people who we met recently and do not know about completely. For one thing, take a group of people who really konw each other and are aware of each other's tastes and mood. If they go to trip, they are more likely to have fun since they are carefuol about waht others like or dislike. While trying not to bother each other, they will have mor fun togethter.
Another subtle point is that one should consider this fact that making new friends would be tough since individuals should keep in touch together enough to socialize which is definitely time and energy consuming. Having stock in a hectic lifestyle, people do not have much time to launch another relationship. Do they find some freetimes, they probably prefer to spend time with someone whom know or a bunch of people caring about them. However, the recently-met people are barely have recognition on ohters. A survey conducted by socialogists in Harvard University indicates a tarde-off between duration of freindship and the discomfort between them which is that the less the time people are together, the more discomfort they have with each other.
To put it briefly, contemplating all reasons and factors, one soon relaizes that lon-lasting relationships are obviously better that having relationship with other new individuals because old friends not only are more trustworthy but also people do not have to spend time and energy to make new firends. Thus, people should keep their own old friends. I firmly recommend people that spend more time with bunch of people who are familiar with.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... their efforts to find reliable firends who are convinient people, findings one would b...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... relationships are obviously better that having relationship with other new indiv...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, however, if, look, really, so, thus, while, as a matter of fact, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2073.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98317307692 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67472689635 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519230769231 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3704556109 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.166666667 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191328707865 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680071392892 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568478336131 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135610895388 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514458505825 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.