tpo 22-q2

Speaking topics in text

tpo 22-q2

Speaking recording
Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Speaking category

Comments

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 115.0 444.711560045 26% => Need more words or more difficult words.
No of words: 40.0 116.580246914 34% => More words wanted. You may: choose simpler words or speak faster or remove hesitations or remove long pauses, and fully use the time, do NOT save one or two seconds.
Chars per words: 2.875 3.81502700369 75% => Maybe there are a lot of short words like 'I' or 'he' in the speeches. or personal experiences are used as examples in the speeches.
Fourth root words length: 2.51486685937 3.28032121604 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 0.953611556138 1.8723322822 51% => Word Length is similar.
Unique words: 31.0 76.076318743 41% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.775 0.655143326166 118% => OK
Syllable count: 41.4 141.574747475 29% => The syllable count is low.
Avg_syllables_per_word: 1.0 1.21358024691 82% => OK

Performance on coherence:
Topic speech coherence ratio: 0.0 0.0738818816272 0% => It may have issues on recording quality or the content is not so closely related to content.

Acoustic performance on paragraphs:
How many acoustic paragraphs: 6.0 3.20202020202 187% => OK
Average paragraph length: 6.66666666667 60.3232687746 11% => The average paragraph length is low.
STD paragraph length: 3.14466037735 17.3634065801 18% => OK
Average paragraph duration: 7.17 22.9064221017 31% => The speaking content is not well organized.
STD paragraph duration: 2.64657640484 6.49597621602 41% => OK

Acoustic performance on sentences:
How many acoustic sentences: 31.0 31.1548821549 100% => OK
Average acoustic sentence length: 1.29032258065 4.0588447711 32% => OK
STD acoustic sentence length: 0.578850272417 3.18357895611 18% => The length of acoustic sentences keeps same.
Average acoustic sentences duration: 0.978709677419 1.46810986539 67% => OK
STD acoustic sentences duration: 1.21414709726 1.01537252472 120% => OK

Acoustic performance on acoustic silence:(An acoustic silence means a little pause between two or more words)
How many acoustic silence: 43.0 28.6644219978 150% => It means the content is not pronounced smoothly or it is pronounced slowly. It is word by word.
Total acoustic silence duration: 15.67 5.28593714927 296% => It may have a lot of silences or every silence is too long.
Average acoustic silence duration: 0.364418604651 0.187982170178 194% => Maybe the pauses are too long.
STD acoustic silence duration: 0.222588391908 0.154715141812 144% => OK

Acoustic performance on acoustic words:
Total word duration: 21.61 35.408047138 61% => Need to talk more.
Average word duration: 0.54025 0.306236595465 176% => OK
STD word duration: 1.06983056486 0.198589292138 539% => It may have hesitations.

Disfluencies: like hesitations, or 'ehn' or taking a long time to pronounce a word:
How many disfluencies: 7.0 6.3164983165 111% => OK
Total_disfluencies_duration: 13.91 5.14435465769 270% => Somehow the hesitation is serious.
Total acoustic noise duration: 4.74 2.80480359147 169% => It may have issues on recording quality or have issues on silences or disfluencies.

Acoustic rates:
Total speech duration: 43.02 45.0716498316 95% => Talk more. Do not save time. People can talk 4-5 words in one second.
Compare to expected duration: 0.956 1.00159221848 95% => OK
Rate of silence: 0.999535099954 0.637764685501 157% => Less acoustic silences wanted.
Rate of speech: 0.92980009298 2.58495923209 36% => Need to bring more content.
Rate of speech by unique words: 0.72059507206 1.68816559523 43% => More unique words wanted.
Rate of word duration by unique words: 1.43452105507 2.15290372801 67% => Need more unique words.
Average articulation rates: 0.2355742 0.343871460585 69% => It may have issues on recording quality or you may have pronounciation issues.

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by speech e-grader: 15.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the speech e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas.