The bar chart depicts the frequency of American people consumed instant food in restaurants over a decade from 2003 until 2013.
It is clear that majority of American in both 2003 and 2006 bate in fast food restaurants once a week while in 2013, people in USA, mainly, consumed junk food once or twice a month.
In 2003, most of people feed fast food weekly for approximately 31% and reached the peak at around 34% in 2006. This pattern followed by people who consumed it for several times a week accounted for nearly 17% and 20% in 2003 and 2006. Interestingly, people who ate junk food once or ...
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: lethianhthu
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013 84
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- A government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of household in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...food once or twice a month. In 2003, most of people feed fast food weekly for approximately...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... frequency of people who feed junk food everyday and never had the same pattern. Both of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e same pattern. Both of them declined in 2006 and remained stable in 2013, below ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35691784507 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516666666667 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5550220913 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.25 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324427884964 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15159015111 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795188892868 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223589966491 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509933088444 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.