Essay topics: ؟؟؟
Although the prime reason of the television managers to increase the time of national news during the late-night news program and lessing the times pertained to weather and local new is ambiguous, the bussiness manager statement does not sound logically for a couple of evidences which are neglected in his speculations.
The author conclusion from the apparantly evidence of increasing complaining viewer decide change the TV schedule to formerly is insufficent. There is no enough evidence to show this recieved complaints are from the real obserervers who are really wanting effective TV programs. Moreover, not only it is vague that these complaint are from vertable viewer, but also we dont know the real statistics relied behind this complaint. It is probable that a person make a complaint more than one time. Even, if all of the complains are recieved from different abservers, how can we make sure they are a statistically sufficient number complaints to conclude a change in the prime decide?
Additionally, There is not any obvious relationship between the recent revoking of bussiness advertisements and the decreased enthusiasm among viewrs . There should be some evidences which shows the bussiness companies main reason to cancel their advertisement. For instance, probably they want to make new advertisement which are tailored to the newe format of the late-night new. Also how can this manager assure him or herself that there is not any other advertising choices? There are a couple of national companies, which instead of the local companies might avidly want to advertise their products in TV last-night news.
Las but not least, what are the proofs which accertain this manager that by reforming the late-night news to the former format the viewers and the advertisement would come back again? what if by doing so the increasing complaints and decreasing advertisement would continue?
However, it might be o wrongheaded idea to change the last format of the late-night news, the author of this memorandum is strongly misconcluding from some insufficint apparantly proofs to rearrange the prorgram formation.