In preceding argument, the author avers that using an honor code to reduce the cheating percentage between Groveton College students was a great method, while the argument seems to be quite plausible at first glance, a closer scrutiny sheds light on a plethora of questions yet to be answered which could dampen the valuation of the prediction made above.
To begin with, we do not know how the report was carried out and wether the result was reliable or the sample was representative of large scope. Even there is a concrete or positive corrolation between the honor code and mitigation the cheating between students, this does not necessarily indicate the causal relationship betwwn the two events. because there are a lot of conditions can be jointly determined by myriad of facors, including students academic level because for example, the first year students are follow all the rules and regulations, and the students major has a direct connection with complexity of the exams that might increase the students urge to cheat for instance the medical major exams are not like engineering exames , or maybe because the students have to inform the teacher if they notice some one cheating that made a psychological effect on them. So, in order to figure out the true cause of this system, a thorough investigation considering the leverage of all possible contributes is expected.
Last but not least, the author implies, about another second survey without mentions any details that reflect the results. hence, the two previous studies per se are not reliable at all, then the extrapolation made based on that would not be valid in the first place. And without valid data, generalization the results on other colleges and universities will not be useful.
In conclusion, depends on the author evidences and studies, the argument does not substantiate the author/'s standpoint in the slightest way, and fails to make a convincing case.
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: To begin with, we do not know how the report was carried out and wether the result was reliable or the sample was representative of large scope.
Error: wether Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Even there is a concrete or positive corrolation between the honor code and mitigation the cheating between students, this does not necessarily indicate the causal relationship betwwn the two events. because there are a lot of conditions can be jointly determined by myriad of facors, including students academic level because for example, the first year students are follow all the rules and regulations, and the students major has a direct connection with complexity of the exams that might
Error: facors Suggestion: factors
Error: betwwn Suggestion: between
Error: corrolation Suggestion: correlation
Sentence: increase the students urge to cheat for instance the medical major exams are not like engineering exames , or maybe because the students have to inform the teacher if they notice some one cheating that made a psychological effect on them.
Error: exames Suggestion: No alternate word
--------------------
flaws:
No. of Words: 318 350 //minimum 3 arguments wanted.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 8 15
No. of Words: 318 350
No. of Characters: 1585 1500
No. of Different Words: 189 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.223 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.984 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.729 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 115 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 86 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 39.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 19.318 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.875 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.386 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.69 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.108 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...sal relationship betwwn the two events. because there are a lot of conditions can be jo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'followed'.
Suggestion: followed
...or example, the first year students are follow all the rules and regulations, and the ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 666, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cheating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'urge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: cheating
...s that might increase the students urge to cheat for instance the medical major exams ar...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 743, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...or exams are not like engineering exames , or maybe because the students have to i...
^^
Line 3, column 818, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...ve to inform the teacher if they notice some one cheating that made a psychological effe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...s any details that reflect the results. hence, the two previous studies per se are no...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 28.8173652695 35% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 55.5748502994 76% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 2260.96107784 72% => OK
No of words: 318.0 441.139720559 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11635220126 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77965406922 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 204.123752495 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610062893082 0.468620217663 130% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 705.55239521 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 19.7664670659 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.8473053892 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 131.852143154 57.8364921388 228% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 180.777777778 119.503703932 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.3333333333 23.324526521 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2222222222 5.70786347227 249% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24890043764 0.218282227539 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689528860521 0.0743258471296 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870301621152 0.0701772020484 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113954547412 0.128457276422 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977371293729 0.0628817314937 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 14.3799401198 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 48.3550499002 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 12.197005988 139% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.5979740519 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.32208582834 120% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 98.500998004 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 12.3882235529 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.1389221557 144% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.9071856287 151% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.