The advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company recommends that to absorb more viewers for their movies the company should allocate more budget to buplic advertising. This recommendation can not be accepted because it rests on a number of questions each of which can challenge the recommendation.
First of all, the advertising director states that decline in the number of their viewers has occurred during last year but does not indicate how the number of viewers of other movie companies changed. Maybe other companies viewers has expanded because of higher quality movies and the degeneration of the qualities of movies in Super Screen Company affected their viewers to decline.
Moreover, the director contends that the percentage of positive reviews they received by movie reviewers has increased, however, does not state how many reviewers participated to analyze their movies. Maybe the total number of reviewers has diminished, however the number of positive views has not changed or even declined in attribution to the years before. In addition, if we assume that the number of positive views has actually increased, maybe the people’s interests reviewers are not identical and the company neglected to consider people’s streaks.
One more to touch on is that the director recommends that the company should allocate a bigger contribution of its budget to the public advertising. This directly affects the budget needed for making movie and might cause weaknesses in the quality of movies anticipated to be produced because the director does not refer to a planning for increasing the total budget.
In sum, the recommendation can not be taken to be correct because as it was mentioned in the body paragraphs, it rests on a number of questions each of which should be clarified. The recommendation can be accepted only if the weaknesses referred to above are all removed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.6327345309 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 2260.96107784 72% => OK
No of words: 305.0 441.139720559 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30163934426 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94930744493 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 204.123752495 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455737704918 0.468620217663 97% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 705.55239521 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0990373261 57.8364921388 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.0 119.503703932 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7272727273 23.324526521 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 5.70786347227 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228490925864 0.218282227539 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894137333553 0.0743258471296 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737887991722 0.0701772020484 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122996811098 0.128457276422 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789933407851 0.0628817314937 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.3799401198 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.3550499002 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.197005988 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.5979740519 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.32208582834 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 98.500998004 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.