Comparison between Prancer and Acer car.
It looks like a car owner and a friend of a person sent a brief suggestion about a car which he wants to buy. According to car owner, two cars launched past year Prancer and Acer. Out of these two, he likes Prancer thw most and strongly urging not to prefer Acer bacause of its performance and feedback compared with Prancer Car. Apart from all, there are many flaws in this one sided suggestion.
According to car owner, Prancer and Acer cars launched in the past year. From the day both launched individually, Acer cars received only few positive feedbacks. The actual time of launch is not specified. Might be Prancer car is launched in first quarter of last year and Acer on the other hand in the last quarter. Since, Prancer has been launched from a big time, 5000 of the cars were sold. Due to same reason Acer Cars received only few positive responces. Waiting for some time, Acer car might receive more positive responces than the Prancer. Again, feedback for Prancer car is not mentioned and we dont know about Prancer's responce from customers.
It is said that, Prancer has a aesthetic pleasing design, and a fuel economy of 30kms per gallon. It is a on sided feedback. We do not know about Acer. Acer might have a better, attractive design that Prancer and additionally a better fuel economy that 30kms per gallon. Additionally, he says Prancer is available for affordable price but didn't mention about price for Acer. With such incomplete information it is not recommended to trust what the person is saying.
Friend who owns a car, is constantly urging his friend to get a Prancer car instead of Acer. he could be a dealer of Prancer car and might have a fixed commission on making company's profit. In such a condition he might have given false information about the cars only to get some personal benefit regardless his friend's goodwill.
After analysing the whole scenario, we cannot say with a good confidence, Prancer car is better that Acer just because of a friend who writes about one sided comparison of these cars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 607, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...for Prancer car is not mentioned and we dont know about Prancers responce from custo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tomers. It is said that, Prancer has a aesthetic pleasing design, and a fuel e...
^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...fuel economy of 30kms per gallon. It is a on sided feedback. We do not know about...
^
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...r is available for affordable price but didnt mention about price for Acer. With such...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...d to get a Prancer car instead of Acer. he could be a dealer of Prancer car and m...
^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...instead of Acer. he could be a dealer of Prancer car and might have a fixed commi...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'apart from', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.272040302267 0.25644967241 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.16120906801 0.15541462614 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0831234256927 0.0836205057962 99% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0478589420655 0.0520304965353 92% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0377833753149 0.0272364105082 139% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.11838790932 0.125424944231 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0453400503778 0.0416121511921 109% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.50254544114 2.79052419416 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0201511335013 0.026700313972 75% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.088161209068 0.113004496875 78% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0151133501259 0.0255425247493 59% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0125944584383 0.0127820249294 99% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2046.0 2731.13054187 75% => OK
No of words: 358.0 446.07635468 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71508379888 6.12365571057 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.57801047555 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.296089385475 0.378187486979 78% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.231843575419 0.287650121315 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.148044692737 0.208842608468 71% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0893854748603 0.135150697306 66% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50254544114 2.79052419416 90% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 207.018472906 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.469332199767 107% => OK
Word variations: 52.7750324224 52.1807786196 101% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.039408867 110% => OK
Sentence length: 16.2727272727 23.2022227129 70% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3227042354 57.7814097925 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 141.986410481 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2727272727 23.2022227129 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.318181818182 0.724660767414 44% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.58251231527 167% => OK
Readability: 39.4570848146 51.9672348444 76% => OK
Elegance: 1.76530612245 1.8405768891 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366520279453 0.441005458295 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0976709878689 0.135418324435 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0659294772096 0.0829849096947 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.492088998391 0.58762219726 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.161322013825 0.147661913831 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132190026867 0.193483328276 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100471744615 0.0970749176394 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.25152424961 0.42659136922 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0592402582146 0.0774707102158 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231317492154 0.312017818177 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603230905266 0.0698173142475 86% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.33743842365 180% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.87684729064 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.82512315271 124% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 6.46551724138 77% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 5.36822660099 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 14.657635468 41% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.