Due to the small possibility of people dying due to the cow vaccine, routine vaccination drives should be abandoned.
Vaccination and immunization drives have always been associated with controversies and relentless debates. The lack of clarity on the potential consequences of inoculations have resulted in scores of people shying away from life-saving medications. However, it should be noted that the scientific reasoning behind inoculation is robust. These issues can be traced back to gross misinformation and a lack of awareness among the general populace.
Routine administration of anti-viral and anti-retroviral vaccines needs to be encouraged. Diseases like anthrax, hepatitis and polio which were once eradicated have now found resurgence in certain communities due to their unwillingness to vaccinate infants.
Given the virility of some of these disease-causing pathogens, a prolonged medicinal course might be unavoidable. This cannot be subsumed by the administration of larger dosages over smaller periods. It is important to identify at-risk communities and start inoculating people from an early age. As far as bovine flu is concerned, people working with or alongside livestock are at a greater risk of contracting the disease, In addition, there is also the allied fear of these people acting as hosts and carriers of the virus.
Consequently, it becomes all the more important to keep these communities up to speed in their inoculations. Like all vaccines, the influenza vaccine also involves the administration of microscopic quantities of the pathogen to trigger the natural proliferation of antigens and antibodies. Alas, it is this practice which has drawn the ire of certain sections of our society. The infinitesimally small possibility that a person will die due to the immunization procedure should not be used as an argument against all inoculations. This argument is deeply flawed due to the following reasons,
Firstly, fatalities due to vaccinations are almost always caused due to unhygienic personal practices. Certain vaccinations require people to follow a strict diet and exercise regiment. Vaccinations are more likely to fail when people remiss on their health provider's instructions. Genetic predispositions to certain drugs can also cause deleterious effects. However, these are statistically insignificant and can be overcome by administering booster dosages and different drug combinations.
Secondly, the cow flu can have multiple hosts. Once the virus crosses the species barrier, it can affect both humans and animals. Therefore, people who eschew this vaccine not only endanger themselves, but also their communities.
Furthermore, one should also take into account that vaccine dosages and combinations are short-lived and need to be regularly updated. A vaccine might prove to be effective against a particular strain of bacteria and viruses. If a population is not vaccinated at the appropriate time, these strains can become resistant to all future medications. This is known as 'antibiotic resistance'. Deaths due to antibiotic resistance are far more common in communities which fail to inoculate its people. From an economic standpoint, the development of vaccines is extremely cumbersome. When the validity of a drug lapses due to resistance, it becomes a futile entity.
The risks associated with the elimination of routine vaccination drives is far too significant to be overlooked. Despite the mathematical probability of fatalities, one needs to understand that the physiological and economic costs of a bovine flu epidemic make inoculations indispensable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-03 | shravankousik | 93 | view |
- Due to the small possibility of people dying due to the cow vaccine, routine vaccination drives should be abandoned. 93
- In every field, politics, government and business, those in power should step down after five years. 58
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men 70
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 32 15
No. of Words: 524 350
No. of Characters: 2915 1500
No. of Different Words: 293 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.784 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.563 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.289 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 233 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 184 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 136 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 106 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.373 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.344 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.224 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.503 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.045 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 8 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 592, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ply flawed due to the following reasons, Firstly, fatalities due to vaccinations ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 55.5748502994 133% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2996.0 2260.96107784 133% => OK
No of words: 524.0 441.139720559 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71755725191 5.12650576532 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7844588288 4.56307096286 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38483775451 2.78398813304 122% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 204.123752495 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549618320611 0.468620217663 117% => OK
syllable_count: 981.0 705.55239521 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59920159681 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 4.96107784431 242% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 19.7664670659 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3782067924 57.8364921388 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6451612903 119.503703932 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9032258065 23.324526521 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77419354839 5.70786347227 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 5.15768463074 155% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 6.88822355289 203% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31524758723 0.218282227539 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683152979826 0.0743258471296 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629022833357 0.0701772020484 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132484826338 0.128457276422 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415519163787 0.0628817314937 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.3799401198 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 48.3550499002 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.6 12.5979740519 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.32208582834 117% => OK
difficult_words: 177.0 98.500998004 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.