The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of KNOW radio station."Several factors indicate that KNOW radio can no longer succeed as a rock-and-roll music station. Consider, for example, that the number of people in our

A memorandum from ''KNOW'' radio station's manager has established the prediction that declining reputation could be preserved by switching the dissemination from rock-and-roll music to 24hours news programs that will engage old people over fifty. Moreover, sales of music is decreasing in the markets and others stations are gaining popularity more and more as News stations. Before declaring the final step, consideration of some hidden or derelict aspects is necessary or even inevitable.
First of all, Is signal quality tantamount to other stations? There is a possibility of poor broadcasting that has urged people to manage their channel list. clarity of sound is no more sound. If this flaw exist within the system then manager's prediction is no so mature.
Secondly, Are young people no more interested in music? Maybe collection of songs are so classical-people feel bored whenever they are played. Teenagers, adults and people less than fifty are looking or inclined towards latest musical composition. Might be station has scarcity of renowned musician' albums. Validity of this mentioned claim could lead to wrong interpretation by the manager.
Finally, it has been assumed that statics of old aged is in immense who are interested in news than others tenacious music listeners. Possibilities are superfluous that adults are higher is numbers than old people. Without this contemplation, old age people will show propensity for ''KNOW station" that could garner further loss.
All above mentioned cases weaken the argument. There are plenty of aspects has been ignored to evaluate the scenario to optimize the results. A meticulous research and evidences are required for decisive conclusion.

Votes
Average: 5 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'stations'' or 'station's'?
Suggestion: stations'; station's
A memorandum from KNOW radio stations manager has established the prediction ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 203, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ns are gaining popularity more and more as News stations. Before declaring the f...
^^
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e as News stations. Before declaring the final step, consideration of some hidden...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ects IS necessary or even inevitable. First of all, is signal quality tantamou...
^^^
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Clarity
...ed people to manage their channel list. clarity of sound is no more sound. If this flaw...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ist. clarity of sound is no more sound. If this flaw exist within the system then ...
^^
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'managers'' or 'manager's'?
Suggestion: managers'; manager's
... this flaw exist within the system then managers prediction is no so mature. Secondl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 213, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'towards the latest'.
Suggestion: towards the latest
...less than fifty are looking or inclined towards latest musical composition. Might be station h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n' that could garner further loss. All above mentioned cases weaken the ar...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 184, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'required'.
Suggestion: required
...A meticulous research and evidences are require for decisive conclusion
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 28.8173652695 42% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 55.5748502994 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 2260.96107784 64% => OK
No of words: 263.0 441.139720559 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47908745247 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.56307096286 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94388427518 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 204.123752495 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638783269962 0.468620217663 136% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 705.55239521 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9636341398 57.8364921388 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0555555556 119.503703932 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6111111111 23.324526521 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.70786347227 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.25449101796 190% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267817859858 0.218282227539 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634493509235 0.0743258471296 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069661886381 0.0701772020484 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126102013622 0.128457276422 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690195914485 0.0628817314937 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 48.3550499002 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.91 12.5979740519 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.32208582834 118% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 98.500998004 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 264 350
No. of Characters: 1407 1500
No. of Different Words: 166 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.031 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.33 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.87 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 108 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 83 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 59 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.529 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.74 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.353 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.284 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.351 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.027 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 2 5