The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy At the same time manufacturers are now marketing many home applianc
The argument states that, according to the electric power company memorandum, they would not need to construct new generating plants because recent surveys shows owners are eager to conserve energy, manufactures are producing compliance that are twice energy efficient and also new technologies are better for home insulation. Stated in this way, the argument missed out several important key factors, on which it could be evaluated. The conclusion of the argument depends on claims that is based on incomplete evidence. Hence, the argument is flawed, incomplete and unconvincing.
Firstly, the argument assumes that, a recent survey indicates that home owners are eager to conserve energy. This might be right but there is a severe fault regarding the survey, how and which way the survey have been conducted, how many participants were actually participated, which type of questions they have been asking. For example, a business firm conducting a random survey in online and conclude that their company is in better position and their company will be on top next season. The statement could have been strengthened, if it would unravel everything regarding their survey.
Secondly, the argument claims that, the manufactures are producing products that is twice energy efficient than a decade ago, but it did not provide any earlier records such as what were the products type, their energy efficiency level. For instance, an energy firm in Seoul claim that, their refrigerator is more energy efficient than other refrigerators in the market, but later found their claims were inauthentic and just propaganda. The point could have been convincing, if it clarify and depict a vivid pictures of earlier records and then comparison would be strengthened.
Moreover, the argument assumes that, total demand of energy of their area will not increase and it will rather decline and then further electricity production is not required. But it is the parochial statement because, the argument did not show any record regarding of their area, energy consumption companies, it is industrial or city area, nothing is delineated well enough. The statement might have been rectified, if it provides a big picture of their area regarding their industries consumption, house consumption and also their geographical characteristics.
Posing several critical and engaging question unanswered, from the energy company survey records, manufactures products quality with their previous records and geographical locations, the argument throw the discreet reader to think, the author is whimsical and merely a day dreamer.
In the end, as the argument failed to answer many questions and also creates a conflicting situations regarding their statement and it does not meet with standard argument criteria. As a result, the argument is flawed, incomplete, and unconvincing to attract a discreet reader attention.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 483, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'clarifies'?
Suggestion: clarifies
...point could have been convincing, if it clarify and depict a vivid pictures of earlier ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'picture'?
Suggestion: picture
...ncing, if it clarify and depict a vivid pictures of earlier records and then comparison ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 92, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'situation'?
Suggestion: situation
...uestions and also creates a conflicting situations regarding their statement and it does n...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.6327345309 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 11.1786427146 197% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 28.8173652695 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 55.5748502994 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 27.0 16.3942115768 165% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2462.0 2260.96107784 109% => OK
No of words: 447.0 441.139720559 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50782997763 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90220325933 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 204.123752495 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496644295302 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 705.55239521 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 18.0 8.76447105788 205% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.925368025 57.8364921388 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.823529412 119.503703932 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2941176471 23.324526521 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 5.70786347227 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177647874915 0.218282227539 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598762938268 0.0743258471296 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077838655913 0.0701772020484 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093748819562 0.128457276422 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595852711598 0.0628817314937 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 14.3799401198 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.3550499002 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.5979740519 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.32208582834 111% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 98.500998004 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 483, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'clarifies'?
Suggestion: clarifies
...point could have been convincing, if it clarify and depict a vivid pictures of earlier ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'picture'?
Suggestion: picture
...ncing, if it clarify and depict a vivid pictures of earlier records and then comparison ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 92, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'situation'?
Suggestion: situation
...uestions and also creates a conflicting situations regarding their statement and it does n...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.6327345309 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 11.1786427146 197% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 28.8173652695 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 55.5748502994 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 27.0 16.3942115768 165% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2462.0 2260.96107784 109% => OK
No of words: 447.0 441.139720559 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50782997763 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90220325933 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 204.123752495 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496644295302 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 705.55239521 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 18.0 8.76447105788 205% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.925368025 57.8364921388 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.823529412 119.503703932 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2941176471 23.324526521 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 5.70786347227 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177647874915 0.218282227539 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598762938268 0.0743258471296 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077838655913 0.0701772020484 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093748819562 0.128457276422 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595852711598 0.0628817314937 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 14.3799401198 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.3550499002 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.5979740519 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.32208582834 111% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 98.500998004 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 483, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'clarifies'?
Suggestion: clarifies
...point could have been convincing, if it clarify and depict a vivid pictures of earlier ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'picture'?
Suggestion: picture
...ncing, if it clarify and depict a vivid pictures of earlier records and then comparison ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 92, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'situation'?
Suggestion: situation
...uestions and also creates a conflicting situations regarding their statement and it does n...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.6327345309 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 11.1786427146 197% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 28.8173652695 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 55.5748502994 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 27.0 16.3942115768 165% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2462.0 2260.96107784 109% => OK
No of words: 447.0 441.139720559 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50782997763 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90220325933 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 204.123752495 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496644295302 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 705.55239521 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 18.0 8.76447105788 205% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.925368025 57.8364921388 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.823529412 119.503703932 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2941176471 23.324526521 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 5.70786347227 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177647874915 0.218282227539 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598762938268 0.0743258471296 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077838655913 0.0701772020484 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093748819562 0.128457276422 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595852711598 0.0628817314937 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 14.3799401198 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.3550499002 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.5979740519 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.32208582834 111% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 98.500998004 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.