The author argues here that they should cover the weather and local news on all their news program. It might seem logical, at first glance, to agree with. However, this argument is replete with vague suppositions and anecdotal information that cannot support either. In support of this argument, the author notes that cause of complaints from viewers and canceling advertising contrast are increasing the time to national news. However, careful scrutiny of the evidence reveals that it provides little credible support for the author’s conclusion.
First of all, the argument readily assumes that the complaints from viewers because they increase the time to national news. However, there is no evidence to prove that most of the complaints received from reviewers actually happened because of increasing time to national news. For example, maybe most of the complaints received from reviewers happen because the quality of the programs are decreased or advertising time is increased and make viewers boring or they show unsuitable news in their programs. For example, my colleagues have held one experimentation about which ask a question from people about features of a good television program. Most of them point out the important features for them is decreasing advertising time.
The argument readily claims that the local business is canceled their contracts because they increase the time to national news. This again is a weak and unsupported claim as it does not demonstrate any clear correlation between canceling local business contracts and increasing the national news time. Maybe the local businesses are canceled their contract because the cost of advertising growth over the past year or the advertising time is not suitable for their product. For instance, companies which produce food products like to broadcast from the morning to noon because people attention absorb to this advertising in the cooking time.
A third problem with the argument is that the writer assumes that with covering weather and local news they can absorb more viewers and advertising contract. However, this is not true in most cases. Maybe over the past years, national news become more importantly relevant to other types of news, or suddenly climate change or natural disaster do not happen. Consequently, maybe in the current year, some other news prevails in the country.
To recapitulate, despite the argument suffers from several problems and is unconvincing but we cannot absolutely rely on it or refuse it without perusing any clear assumptions and reasoning. To bolster it further, the author must provide more concrete evidence, perhaps by way of a reliable a detailed analysis of increasing viewers’ complaints and canceling advertising contract. Without these changes, the argument is implausible and the reasoning is faulty.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 444 350
No. of Characters: 2343 1500
No. of Different Words: 209 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.59 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.277 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.688 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 182 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 158 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 105 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 52 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.143 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.14 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.321 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.54 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.102 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, however, may, so, third, for example, for instance, first of all, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 11.1786427146 170% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 28.8173652695 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2404.0 2260.96107784 106% => OK
No of words: 444.0 441.139720559 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41441441441 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7858275538 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 204.123752495 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475225225225 0.468620217663 101% => OK
syllable_count: 741.6 705.55239521 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2856423536 57.8364921388 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.476190476 119.503703932 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 23.324526521 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47619047619 5.70786347227 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 6.88822355289 203% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366810698025 0.218282227539 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123471212731 0.0743258471296 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091797350453 0.0701772020484 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20791438852 0.128457276422 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830468364353 0.0628817314937 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.3550499002 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.5979740519 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 98.500998004 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.