An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The concerns relating to the health of the person needs immediate attention. Vitamin deficiencies may cause a long and short term impact on the health as well as the well being of the nation. The government of Tagus should take an immediate decision on the proposed new breed of vitamin A as administered by international development organization. Before considering, the officials should visualize the pros and cones associated with the topic.
The government should consider the quality testing before the initiation of the project. The crop modelling should be done to ensure the quality. The growth, vigour and tentative percentage of the vitamin A present in the new varieties should also be evaluated. Similarly, the suitability of the new varieties in new location is also a matter of deep and immediate concern. It may be the long term process, so immediate actions should also be enforced. This action may be in the form of tablets or some medicines. The multiple approach should be carried out to solve the problems.
The other thing is that, the government should partially allow to cultivate the new varieties. This is because the insect pest may infect the new varieties resulting in epidemic food disaster which may be worst than the present condition. The combinations of the various varieties have low diseases and pest infestations. Multiple crop approach may be a preventable solution to the attack of the disease. Similarly, the new varieties should also be quarantined to evaluate the allelopathic effect on the nearby crops.
Therefore, these recommendations should be evaluated and further decisions should be carried out to solve the immediate problem. They should utilize the probable solutions of the problem without risking the life of country fellows. If all the suggestions are considered prior to decisions then it may result in the well being of the people as well as the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-20 | Dinesh4518 | 63 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Nowshin Tabassum | 69 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | Gnyana | 68 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Prasad002 | 59 | view |
| 2023-07-08 | tanvik21 | 74 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
- Being famous has advantages and disadvantages , discuss and give your opinion 61
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant 84
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 310 350
No. of Characters: 1572 1500
No. of Different Words: 156 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.196 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.071 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.849 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 126 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 68 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.316 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.485 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.526 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.339 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.506 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.096 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...g should be done to ensure the quality. The growth, vigour and tentative percentage...
^^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cultivating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: cultivating
..., the government should partially allow to cultivate the new varieties. This is because the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: WORST_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worse'?
Suggestion: worse
... in epidemic food disaster which may be worst than the present condition. The combina...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 519, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llelopathic effect on the nearby crops. Therefore, these recommendations should ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, similarly, so, then, therefore, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.9520958084 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 13.6137724551 15% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 28.8173652695 24% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 55.5748502994 68% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 2260.96107784 71% => OK
No of words: 310.0 441.139720559 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94386608979 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 204.123752495 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 705.55239521 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.76447105788 137% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0463846975 57.8364921388 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.8421052632 119.503703932 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3157894737 23.324526521 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31578947368 5.70786347227 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169602974671 0.218282227539 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581702777863 0.0743258471296 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592659267056 0.0701772020484 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115167459897 0.128457276422 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510800207838 0.0628817314937 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.3799401198 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.3550499002 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.32208582834 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 98.500998004 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.