An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid

Essay topics:

An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet.

Here in the prompt, recommendation has been made that as millet is already the staple food in Tagus, so the newly invented Vitamin A enriched millet will be readily accepted by the people of Tagus. The recommendation would produce intended result if the below mentioned three related questions can be answered correctly considering the choices made by the people of Tagus.
Firstly, the farmers would have to produce new variety of millet with high cost to ensure enough millet supply in the market so that demand of millet can be fulfilled. For this very reason farmers will be paid subsidies. Now the question is whether the subsidy amount intended to be given to the farmers will be sufficient enough to secure farmers' benefit to produce the new variety of millet. If they can't make profit at least equal to or greater than the amount made from the existing variety, they might not want to produce the new variety, which in turn would hinder the supply of new millet in the market.
Secondly, although millet is the staple food in Tagus and people of Tagus is accustomed to the test of existing variety of millet, so the question would be whether the taste of new variety of millet can satisfy the people of Tagus to supplant the existing variety. If the taste is not up to the choice of the people of Tagus, then many of the citizens would continue using the low Vitamin A contained millet, would remain vitamin A deficient and the Governments' try would go in vain.
Thirdly, as the new variety is a bio-engineered, not a natural variety, many people might not be willing to try the new variety from superstition. Then the new variety won't be reached to this community unless proper dissemination of knowledge about its safety is ensured by the Government to all the citizens. So the question would be if Government can secure people's trust in the new variety with proper steps. If the Government fail then many of the citizens would stay vitamin A deficient without the consumption of the new variety.
If any of the above-mentioned questions can't be fulfilled by the Government, then the result would abandonment of the new variety the citizens of Tagus which will hamper the intended result of the recommendation.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 402, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...duce the new variety of millet. If they cant make profit at least equal to or greate...
^^^^
Line 4, column 412, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t in the new variety with proper steps. If the Government fail then many of the ci...
^^
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...If any of the above-mentioned questions cant be fulfilled by the Government, then th...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, at least

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.9520958084 154% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 11.1786427146 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 28.8173652695 24% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 2260.96107784 82% => OK
No of words: 384.0 441.139720559 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79947916667 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67963435321 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 204.123752495 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.403645833333 0.468620217663 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 705.55239521 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.8473053892 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.5718286826 57.8364921388 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.769230769 119.503703932 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5384615385 23.324526521 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 5.70786347227 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334751176939 0.218282227539 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148625755116 0.0743258471296 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582047738125 0.0701772020484 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198575313498 0.128457276422 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643715913457 0.0628817314937 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.3799401198 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.5979740519 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 98.500998004 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.1389221557 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 385 350
No. of Characters: 1815 1500
No. of Different Words: 149 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.43 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.714 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.601 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 141 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 94 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 51 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.615 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.927 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.846 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.448 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.448 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.186 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5