Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i

Essay topics:

Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

The author of this argument concluded that permission of inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered is not allowed due to the fact that there can be a possibility of people's death after the inoculation is taken. However, before this recommendation can be evaluated two evidences are needed to be proved.
Firstly, the author needs to provide the evidence that people who used inoculations died from the usage of the drug, the question to be asked is: the people that used the inoculation did they die as a result of the drug? or are there symptoms of other types of sickness in their body? the answer to this question is people could die as a result of anything against their body or health. responses to sicknesses matter and these responses are needed to be figured out. If the illustration above proves true, then the conclusion of the argument is weakened.
secondly, has any test or experiment ever been carried out in the lab to find out the proper structure of the effect of the inoculation, the progress in the body, the bad and the good effect and how it fights the disease in the body, a certain girl of 12 years in the area where the disease was detected could be responsive to the use of the drug and have no side effect in her body or the drug could even work for other things and this would not lead to her death but only make her feel better not worse. if this is proved true then the conclusion of the argument is invalid and the questions needed to be answered.
In conclusion, the argument as it stands is flawed due to reliance on certain unwarranted assumptions and the author needs to provide more evidence such as a research study or program, then this evidence will help to evaluate the viability that inoculations against cow flu should be routinely administered

Votes
Average: 5 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 222, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Or
...n did they die as a result of the drug? or are there symptoms of other types of si...
^^
Line 2, column 286, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... other types of sickness in their body? the answer to this question is people could...
^^^
Line 2, column 388, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Responses
... anything against their body or health. responses to sicknesses matter and these response...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onclusion of the argument is weakened. secondly, has any test or experiment eve...
^^
Line 3, column 3, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...clusion of the argument is weakened. secondly, has any test or experiment ever been c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the lab to find out the proper structure of the effect of the inoculation, the pr...
^^
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ut only make her feel better not worse. if this is proved true then the conclusion...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the questions needed to be answered. In conclusion, the argument as it stands...
^^^
Line 4, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cow flu should be routinely administered
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, then, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 55.5748502994 85% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 2260.96107784 66% => OK
No of words: 321.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6292834891 5.12650576532 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65618299092 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 204.123752495 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495327102804 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 705.55239521 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 19.7664670659 51% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.8473053892 140% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 133.138273986 57.8364921388 230% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 148.6 119.503703932 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1 23.324526521 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 5.70786347227 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239622464381 0.218282227539 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917009277566 0.0743258471296 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895307731714 0.0701772020484 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156306256948 0.128457276422 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598366881113 0.0628817314937 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.3799401198 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.3550499002 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.17 12.5979740519 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 98.500998004 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 12.3882235529 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.1389221557 133% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 7 15
No. of Words: 321 350
No. of Characters: 1459 1500
No. of Different Words: 152 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.233 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.545 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.618 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 95 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 67 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 51 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 1 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 45.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 32.033 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.857 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.444 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.726 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.107 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5