As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Technology they say is for self reliance. This means that it is for the purpose of making things that are a bit difficult for humans to do and making it simple. The propmpt recommends that when humans rely and always expect technology to be the solution to everything, the level of their thinking reduces and they will not be able to do things without it. I strongly dissagree with this suggestion and argue that humans can still think sharply with the use of technology because it is as a result of human thinking. This position can be explained below.
Firstly, technology helps to reduce the mental stress that affects humans which makes it easier rather than hindering the ability to think. A student who was given an assignment on the topic of data interpretation in mathematics which involves large numbers of people and places gotten from statistics. The point of the assignment is to test how the student can think on how to interprete the data given into simpler forms and then give out the result. This task can be done by the student and the calculation process can be carried out with the aid of a calculator when it gets to the part of the big numbers. The calculator here is an invention of technology and it does not stop the student from figuring out how to tackle the problem because that is not its job but rather the student figuring it out on his/her own which reduces the level of stress the brain will have to go through and the calculator was just there to aid the process and make it easier. The illustration above shows that the human ability to think does not depreciate with the reliance on technology but rather made things easier.
some people may say that it affects your level of thinking because at every first run into a particular problem techonology will be the solution, however technology will only do the assignemnt given to it to be carried out by humans and it does not do the thinking provess because the brain is responsible for that and what you input is the result you get. In conclusion, dependency on technology is for an easier process not diminishing the level of thinking.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
... not be able to do things without it. I strongly dissagree with this suggestion and argue that hum...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...hnology but rather made things easier. some people may say that it affects your lev...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, still, then, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61904761905 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55730766889 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441798941799 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 542.7 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.1557724211 60.3974514979 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.307692308 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0769230769 23.4991977007 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224421617073 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838495917005 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512278588097 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16272642409 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309448924969 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 48.8420337079 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 12.1743820225 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.11 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.